p.errorf("misplaced //go:build comment")
			}
			continue
		}
		if tok != '\n' {
			p.sawCode = true
		}
		if tok == '#' {
			// A leftover wisp of a #include/#define/etc,
			// to let us know that p.sawCode should be true now.
			// Otherwise ignored.
			continue
		}
		return tok
	}
}

// line consumes a single assembly line from p.lex of the form
//

     * correctly installed
     *
     * <p>{@link #transitioned}: is set by {@link #transitionService} to indicate that some
     * transition has been performed.
     *
     * <p>Together, they allow us to enforce that all services have their listeners installed prior
     * to any service performing a transition, then we can fail in the ServiceManager constructor
     * rather than in a Service.Listener callback.
     */

     * correctly installed
     *
     * <p>{@link #transitioned}: is set by {@link #transitionService} to indicate that some
     * transition has been performed.
     *
     * <p>Together, they allow us to enforce that all services have their listeners installed prior
     * to any service performing a transition, then we can fail in the ServiceManager constructor
     * rather than in a Service.Listener callback.
     */

            dayOfMonth = matcher.group(1).toInt()
          }
          month == -1 && matcher.usePattern(MONTH_PATTERN).matches() -> {
            val monthString = matcher.group(1).lowercase(Locale.US)
            month = MONTH_PATTERN.pattern().indexOf(monthString) / 4 // Sneaky! jan=1, dec=12.
          }
          year == -1 && matcher.usePattern(YEAR_PATTERN).matches() -> {
            year = matcher.group(1).toInt()

         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our
         * new TypeVariable _will_ be equal to is an equivalent TypeVariable that was also created
         * by us. And that equality is guaranteed to hold because it doesn't involve the JDK
         * TypeVariable implementation at all.
         */
        if (Types.NativeTypeVariableEquals.NATIVE_TYPE_VARIABLE_ONLY

     * define a separate MultimapLink interface with a separate "header" implementation, which
     * hopefully could avoid implementing Entry or ValueSetLink at all. (But note that that approach
     * requires us to define extra classes -- unfortunate under Android.) *Then* we could consider
     * lying about the fields below on the grounds that we always initialize them just after the

    assertThat(verifier.verify("\u2121.com", session)).isFalse()
    assertThat(verifier.verify("℡.com", session)).isFalse()

    // These should ideally be false, but we know that hostname is usually already checked by us
    assertThat(verifier.verify("\u212A.com", session)).isFalse()
    // Kelvin character below
    assertThat(verifier.verify("K.com", session)).isFalse()
  }

  @Test fun specialKInCert() {

       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even
       * permits us to throw IllegalStateException. Maybe we should have done that, but we probably
       * shouldn't change now for fear of breaking people.)
       *

      }
      queue[index] = x;
      return index;
    }

    // About the term "aunt node": it's better to leave gender out of it, but for this the English
    // language has nothing for us. Except for the whimsical neologism "pibling" (!) which we
    // obviously could not expect to increase anyone's understanding of the code.

    /**

        totalCount = laterCount = currentEntry.getCount();
      }
      laterCount--;
      canRemove = true;
      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe because laterCount starts at 0, forcing us to initialize
       * currentEntry above. After that, we never clear it.
       */
      return requireNonNull(currentEntry).getElement();
    }

    @Override
    public void remove() {