}
                }
            }

            for (final String s : fessConfig.getSearchlogRequestHeadersAsArray()) {
                final String key = s.replace('-', '_').toLowerCase(Locale.ENGLISH);
                Collections.list(req.getHeaders(s)).stream().forEach(v -> {
                    searchLog.addRequestHeaderValue(key, v);
                });
            }

			for _, vv := range vars {
				subdb.Statement.Vars = append(subdb.Statement.Vars, vv)
				bindvar := strings.Builder{}
				subdb.BindVarTo(&bindvar, subdb.Statement, vv)
				sql = strings.Replace(sql, bindvar.String(), "?", 1)
			}

			subdb.Statement.SQL.Reset()
			subdb.Statement.Vars = stmt.Vars
			if strings.Contains(sql, "@") {
				clause.NamedExpr{SQL: sql, Vars: vars}.Build(subdb.Statement)

* La encriptación de la conexión ocurre a nivel de **TCP**.
    * Esa es una capa **debajo de HTTP**.
    * Por lo tanto, el manejo de **certificados y encriptación** se realiza **antes de HTTP**.
* **TCP no sabe acerca de "dominios"**. Solo sobre direcciones IP.
    * La información sobre el **dominio específico** solicitado va en los **datos HTTP**.

    `requestBodyEnd()`, both on the same call. Such events may be triggered by different threads
    even for a single call.

    Interceptors that rewrite or replace the request body may now inadvertently interfere with
    duplex request bodies. Such interceptors should check `RequestBody.isDuplex()` and avoid
    accessing the request body when it is.

- For metrics `apiserver_cache_list_fetched_objects_total`, `apiserver_cache_list_returned_objects_total`, `apiserver_cache_list_total` replace `resource_prefix` label with API `group` and `resource` labels.
  For metrics `etcd_request_duration_seconds`, `etcd_requests_total` and `etcd_request_errors_total` replace `type` label with API `resource` and `group` label.
  For metric `apiserver_selfrequest_total` add a API `group` label.

 * Finally, every possible combination of row and column keys is always considered to have a value
 * associated with it: It is not possible to "remove" a value, only to replace it with {@code null},
 * which will still appear when iterating over the table's contents in a foreach loop or a call to a
 * null-hostile method like {@link ImmutableTable#copyOf}. For alternatives, please see <a

 * {@code S-1-5-21-1496946806-2192648263-3843101252-1029} but they may
 * also be resolved to yield the name of the associated Windows account
 * such as {@code Administrators} or {@code MYDOM\alice}.
 * <p>
 * Consider the following output of {@code examples/SidLookup.java}:
 * <pre>
 *        toString: S-1-5-21-4133388617-793952518-2001621813-512
 * toDisplayString: WNET\Domain Admins
 *         getType: 2

                + Arrays.toString(kinds) + ", emptySource=" + emptySource + ", id=" + id + "]";
    }

    private String convertJsonString(final String value) {
        return "\"" + value.replace("\"", "\\\"") + "\"";
    }

    private String convertJsonStrings(final String[] values) {
        if (values == null) {
            return "[]";
        }

    @Test
    void toString_withMSBrowseName_shouldReplaceSpecialCharacters() {
        Name name = new Name(mockConfig, "\u0001MSBROWSE      ", 0x01, null);
        String result = name.toString();

        // Should replace first char with '..' and char at position 14 with '.'
        assertTrue(result.contains(".."));
        assertFalse(result.contains("\u0001"));
    }

    @Test

defines the number of nodes that if not Ready in time won’t cause kube-up
failure.
  * “kubectl rolling-update” only supports Replication Controllers (it doesn’t
support Replica Sets). It’s recommended to use Deployment 1.2 with “kubectl
rollout” commands instead, if you want to rolling update Replica Sets.
  * When live upgrading Kubelet to 1.2 without draining the pods running on the node,