With the `mc` tool, the configuration is very simple to add. Let us say that the MinIO server is aliased as `myminio` in our mc configuration. Execute the following:

```
mc mb myminio/images
mc event add  myminio/images arn:minio:sqs::1:elasticsearch --suffix .jpg
mc event list myminio/images

            Parent parent = currentModel.getParent();

            // Check if this parent is in our local pomMap
            Path parentPath = findParentInPomMap(parent, pomMap);
            if (parentPath != null) {
                // Parent is local, so it becomes our new candidate
                lastLocalParent = parentPath;

                // Load the parent model to continue walking up

  private static final char LEAST = Character.MIN_VALUE;
  private static final char GREATEST = Character.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final char[] VALUES = {LEAST, 'a', '\u00e0', '\udcaa', GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (char value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Chars.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Character.hashCode(value));
    }

                    customThreadFound.incrementAndGet();
                }
            };

            ThreadDumpUtil.processThreadDump(searchConsumer);

            // Verify that our custom thread was captured
            assertTrue("Should find custom thread in dump", customThreadFound.get() > 0);

        } finally {
            latch.countDown();

**In our tests we also found ext4 does not honor POSIX O_DIRECT/Fdatasync semantics, ext4 trades performance for consistency guarantees. Please avoid ext4 in your setup.**

            // While we could look up the domain controller/KDC we cannot really make the java kerberos implementation
            // use a KDC of our choice.
            // A potential workaround would be to try to get the server FQDN by reverse lookup, but this might have
            // security implications and also is not how Microsoft does it.

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (long value : VALUES) {
      assertWithMessage("hashCode for %s", value)
          .that(Longs.hashCode(value))
          .isEqualTo(Long.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.

  private static final short GREATEST = Short.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final short[] VALUES = {LEAST, (short) -1, (short) 0, (short) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (short value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Shorts.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Short.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

    a.set(0, 1.0);
    Thread t =
        newStartedThread(
            new CheckedRunnable() {
              @Override
              @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // doing our best to test for races
              public void realRun() {
                while (!a.compareAndSet(0, 2.0, 3.0)) {
                  Thread.yield();
                }
              }
            });

import static org.elasticsearch.gradle.internal.vagrant.VagrantMachine.convertLinuxPath;
import static org.elasticsearch.gradle.internal.vagrant.VagrantMachine.convertWindowsPath;

/**
 * This class defines gradle tasks for testing our various distribution artifacts.
 */
public class DistroTestPlugin implements Plugin<Project> {
    private static final String SYSTEM_JDK_VERSION = "11.0.2+9";
    private static final String SYSTEM_JDK_VENDOR = "openjdk";