@Nested
    @DisplayName("Constructor Tests")
    class ConstructorTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should create response with default values")
        void testConstructor() {
            SrvCopyChunkCopyResponse copyResponse = new SrvCopyChunkCopyResponse();
            assertNotNull(copyResponse);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should initialize chunksWritten to zero")

        assertEquals(6, macAddress.length);
    }

    @Test
    void writeBodyWireFormat_shouldReturnZero() {
        byte[] dst = new byte[100];
        int result = response.writeBodyWireFormat(dst, 10);
        assertEquals(0, result);
    }

    @Test
    void readBodyWireFormat_shouldDelegateToReadResourceRecordWireFormat() throws Exception {
        // Prepare test data with minimal valid resource record

    assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("started transitioning asynchronously");
  }

  /**
   * This test is for a case where two Service.Listener callbacks for the same service would call
   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster" target="_blank">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions/workflows/test.yml/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi" target="_blank">
    <img src="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/fastapi/fastapi.svg" alt="Coverage">

        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the
        real-world use case so the community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually

## How to access to files inside a ZIP archive

Accessing to contents inside an archive can be done using regular S3 API with a modified request path. You just need to append the path of the content inside the archive to the path of the archive itself.

e.g.:

Just remember, the most important point is: try to be kind. People come with their frustrations and in many cases don't ask in the best way, but try as best as you can to be kind. 🤗

        return new SmbPipeHandleImpl(pipe);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("ensureTreeConnected acquires and reuses the tree handle")
    void ensureTreeConnected_acquireAndReuse() throws Exception {
        // Arrange
        SmbPipeHandleImpl handle = newHandleWithBasicStubs(0, "\\\\pipe\\\\test");
        when(pipe.ensureTreeConnected()).thenReturn(tree);
        when(tree.acquire()).thenReturn(tree);

 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @param <K> The key type of the tested multimap.
 * @param <V> The value type of the tested multimap.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@NullMarked

 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @param <K> The key type of the tested multimap.
 * @param <V> The value type of the tested multimap.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@NullMarked