import static com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.base.Equivalence;
import com.google.common.base.Function;

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;

import com.google.common.collect.Synchronized.SynchronizedCollection;
import com.google.common.collect.Synchronized.SynchronizedSet;
import com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester;
import java.io.Serializable;

        // Test case: close() with non-zero retval from MsrpcSamrCloseHandle, should throw SmbException
        String server = "testServer";
        int access = 123;
        int errorRetval = 12345; // Simulate an error code

        // Setup for successful constructor
        doNothing().when(mockHandle).sendrecv(any(MsrpcSamrConnect4.class));

        // Setup for close to return an error

import org.apache.maven.model.profile.ProfileActivationContext;

/**
 * Determines profile activation based on the version of the current Java runtime.
 *
 * @see Activation#getJdk()
 * @deprecated use {@code org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Named("jdk-version")
@Singleton
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")
public class JdkVersionProfileActivator implements ProfileActivator {

    <!-- Checks that the order of modifiers conforms to the suggestions in the
    Java Language specification, sections 8.1.1, 8.3.1 and 8.4.3. It is not that
    the standard is perfect, but having a consistent order makes the code more
    readable and no other order is compellingly better than the standard.
    The correct order is:
            public
            protected
            private
            abstract
            static

 */
package org.codelibs.fess.entity;

import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.OutputStream;
import java.util.Locale;
import java.util.Set;

import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;
import org.codelibs.fess.Constants;
import org.codelibs.fess.util.ComponentUtil;
import org.codelibs.fess.util.SearchEngineUtil;
import org.lastaflute.di.exception.IORuntimeException;

 */
package org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exentity;

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;

import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;
import org.codelibs.fess.Constants;
import org.codelibs.fess.app.service.WebConfigService;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.client.http.config.CredentialsConfig;

 */
package org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exentity;

import java.util.Map;
import java.util.function.Supplier;

import org.apache.http.auth.UsernamePasswordCredentials;
import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;
import org.codelibs.fess.Constants;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.client.CrawlerClientFactory;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.client.ftp.FtpClient;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.client.http.HcHttpClient;

    public void test_hashCode() {
        // Test hashCode consistency
        int metadataHashCode = SsoResponseType.METADATA.hashCode();
        int logoutHashCode = SsoResponseType.LOGOUT.hashCode();

        // Hash code should be consistent for the same object
        assertEquals(metadataHashCode, SsoResponseType.METADATA.hashCode());
        assertEquals(logoutHashCode, SsoResponseType.LOGOUT.hashCode());

 * prefer other mechanisms where they exist, such as with
 * [okhttp3.internal.platform.AndroidPlatform.AndroidCertificateChainCleaner].
 *
 * This class includes code from [Conscrypt's][Conscrypt] [TrustManagerImpl] and
 * [TrustedCertificateIndex].
 *
 * [Conscrypt]: https://conscrypt.org/
 */
class BasicCertificateChainCleaner(
  private val trustRootIndex: TrustRootIndex,