// validation needed.
			continue
		case !strings.Contains(output, line1):
			t.Errorf("Testcase %d: output '%s' did not contain line 1: '%s'", i+1, output, line1)
		case !strings.Contains(output, line2):
			t.Errorf("Testcase %d: output '%s' did not contain line 2: '%s'", i+1, output, line2)
		}
	}

     * @param externalRepositories The external (and already mirrored) repositories to merge into the result list, may
     *            be {@code null}.
     * @param request The project building request holding further settings like repository settings, must not be
     *            {@code null}.
     * @return The effective artifact repositories, never {@code null}.
     * @throws InvalidRepositoryException
     */

## Pydantic Models for Input and Output { #pydantic-models-for-input-and-output }

Let's say you have a Pydantic model with default values, like this one:

{* ../../docs_src/separate_openapi_schemas/tutorial001_py310.py ln[1:7] hl[7] *}

### Model for Input { #model-for-input }

If you use this model as an input like here:

{* ../../docs_src/separate_openapi_schemas/tutorial001_py310.py ln[1:15] hl[14] *}

                        // and captures the content within the brackets.
                        Files.readAllLines(file).forEach(line -> {
                            if (line.matches("^\\s*\\[\\[(.*)\\]\\].*")) {
                                String anchorName = line.replaceAll("^\\s*\\[\\[(.*)\\]\\].*$", "$1");
                                allAnchors.add(anchorName);
                            }

        url,
        charset,
        new LineProcessor<List<String>>() {
          final List<String> result = new ArrayList<>();

          @Override
          public boolean processLine(String line) {
            result.add(line);
            return true;
          }

          @Override
          public List<String> getResult() {
            return result;
          }
        });
  }

  /**

# Patterns to ignore when building packages.
# This supports shell glob matching, relative path matching, and
# negation (prefixed with !). Only one pattern per line.
.DS_Store
# Common VCS dirs
.git/
.gitignore
.bzr/
.bzrignore
.hg/
.hgignore
.svn/
# Common backup files
*.swp
*.bak
*.tmp
*~
# Various IDEs
.project
.idea/
*.tmproj
# OWNERS file for Kubernetes

 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
public interface UpgradeOptions extends Options {
    /**
     * Returns the list of upgrade goals to be executed.
     * These goals can include operations like "check", "dependencies", "plugins", etc.
     *
     * @return an {@link Optional} containing the list of goals, or empty if not specified
     */
    @Nonnull
    Optional<List<String>> goals();

    /**

* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

The *Build Tool Team* has decided to use Architectural Decision Records (aka ADR) to track decisions we want to follow.

		t.Fatalf("got error: %v", err)
	}

	if len(users) != 4 {
		t.Errorf("Four users should be found, instead found %d", len(users))
	}

	DB.Select("*").Where("name LIKE ?", "subquery%").Where("age >= (?)", DB.
		Select("AVG(age)").Table("users").Where("name LIKE ?", "subquery%")).Find(&users)

mvn formatter:format           # Format code
mvn license:format             # Update license headers
```

### Code Style

- 4 spaces (no tabs)
- Opening brace on same line
- Max line length: 120
- JavaDoc required for public APIs
- License headers required

### Testing

**Structure**: `src/test/java/org/codelibs/fess/crawler/`
**Frameworks**: JUnit 4, UTFlute, Mockito, Testcontainers