f e.getAttribute&&e.getAttribute("class")||"")})},ATTR:function(n,r,i){return function(e){var t=I.attr(e,n);return null==t?"!="===r:!r||(t+="","="===r?t===i:"!="===r?t!==i:"^="===r?i&&0===t.indexOf(i):"*="===r?i&&-1<t.indexOf(i):"$="===r?i&&t.slice(-i.length)===i:"~="===r?-1<(" "+t.replace(v," ")+" ").indexOf(i):"|="===r&&(t===i||t.slice(0,i.length+1)===i+"-"))}},CHILD:function(d,e,t,h,g){var v="nth"!==d.slice(0,3),y="last"!==d.slice(-4),m="of-type"===e;return 1===h&&0===g?function(e){return!!e....

    // Here we know that:
    // * (to < from) and that both are valid indices.
    // * Everything with (index < to) should be kept.
    // * Everything with (to <= index < from) should be removed.
    // * The element with (index == from) should be kept.
    // * Everything with (index > from) has not been checked yet.

    // Check from the end of the list backwards (minimize expected cost of

    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(template.length() + 16 * args.length);
    int templateStart = 0;
    int i = 0;
    while (i < args.length) {
      int placeholderStart = template.indexOf("%s", templateStart);
      if (placeholderStart == -1) {
        break;
      }
      builder.append(template.substring(templateStart, placeholderStart));
      builder.append(args[i++]);

        List<String> order = Lists.newArrayList();
        for (String s : insertionOrder) {
          int index = order.indexOf(s);
          if (index == -1) {
            order.add(s);
          } else {
            order.add(index, s);
          }
        }
        return order;
      }
    };
  }

  public void testCreate() {

            return;
        }
        for (final String value : values) {
            if (value.indexOf(',') >= 0) {
                action.throwValidationError(messages -> {
                    messages.addErrorsInvalidStrIsIncluded(propertyName, value, ",");
                }, hook);
            }
            if (value.indexOf("=>") >= 0) {
                action.throwValidationError(messages -> {

        }
        this.pathConsumed -= i;
    }


    @Override
    public void fixupDomain ( String dom ) {
        String s = getServer();
        if ( s.indexOf('.') < 0 && s.toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT).equals(s) ) {
            String fqdn = s + "." + dom;
            if ( log.isDebugEnabled() ) {
                log.debug(String.format("Applying DFS netbios name hack %s -> %s ", s, fqdn));

        if (entryDn == null) {
            return null;
        }
        int start = entryDn.toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT).indexOf("cn=");
        if (start == -1) {
            return null;
        }
        start += 3;

        final int end = entryDn.indexOf(',', start);
        final String value = end == -1 ? entryDn.substring(start) : entryDn.substring(start, end);

import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.exception.RobotsTxtException;

/**
 * Robots.txt Specifications:
 * <ul>
 * <li><a href=
 * "https://developers.google.com/webmasters/control-crawl-index/docs/robots_txt"
 * >https://developers.google.com/webmasters/control-crawl-index/docs/robots_txt
 * </a></li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @author bowez
 * @author shinsuke
 *
 */
public class RobotsTxtHelper {

        return path.toString();
    }

    private String insertRepositoryKey(String filename, String repositoryKey) {
        String result;
        int idx = filename.indexOf('.');
        if (idx < 0) {
            result = filename + '-' + repositoryKey;
        } else {
            result = filename.substring(0, idx) + '-' + repositoryKey + filename.substring(idx);
        }

    * Wenn Sie FastAPI nicht, und direkt Starlette (oder ein anderes Tool wie Sanic, Flask, Responder, usw.) verwenden würden, müssten Sie die gesamte Datenvalidierung und Serialisierung selbst implementieren. Ihre finale Anwendung hätte also immer noch den gleichen Overhead, als ob sie mit FastAPI erstellt worden...