- Kube-scheduler: add taints filtering logic consistent with TaintToleration plugin for PodTopologySpread plugin ([#112357](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/112357), [@SataQiu](https://github.com/SataQiu)) [SIG Scheduling and Testing]

        assertEquals("file with spaces.txt", result.get(1).getFileName());
        assertEquals("file@#$%.txt", result.get(2).getFileName());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test NotifyResponse consistency across multiple calls")
    void testNotifyResponseConsistency() {
        List<FileNotifyInformation> notifications = Arrays.asList(mockNotifyInfo1, mockNotifyInfo2);

	// Check whether uid is still active.
	resource, ok := l.lockUID[formatUUID(args.UID, 0)]
	if !ok {
		return false, nil
	}
	idx := 0
	for {
		lris, ok := l.lockMap[resource]
		if !ok {
			// Inconsistent. Delete UID.
			delete(l.lockUID, formatUUID(args.UID, idx))
			return idx > 0, nil
		}
		now := UTCNow()
		for i := range lris {
			if lris[i].UID == args.UID {
				lris[i].TimeLastRefresh = now.UnixNano()

                            String ruleId = testRule.getRuleId();
                            ResponseProcessor proc = testRule.getResponseProcessor();

                            // Verify consistency
                            if (!"concurrentRule".equals(ruleId)) {
                                errorCount.incrementAndGet();
                            }
                            if (proc != processor) {

replication status is reflected as `PENDING`.

If 3 or more targets are participating in active-active replication, the replication configuration for replica metadata sync, delete marker replication and delete replication should match to avoid inconsistent picture between the clusters. It is not recommended to turn on asymmetric replication - for e.g. if three sites A,B,C are participating in replication, it would be better to avoid replication setups like A -> [B, C], B -> A. In this particular...

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

L'une des principales fonctionnalités nécessaires aux systèmes API est la "<abbr title="également appelée
marshalling, conversion">sérialisation</abbr>" des données, qui consiste à prendre les données du code (Python) et à
les convertir en quelque chose qui peut être envoyé sur le réseau. Par exemple, convertir un objet contenant des

		if name != "PC" && a.Name == obj.NAME_NONE {
			p.errorf("cannot reference %s without a symbol", name)
		}
		p.setPseudoRegister(a, name, false, prefix)
		return
	}
	a.Reg = r1
	if r2 != 0 {
		// TODO: Consistency in the encoding would be nice here.
		if p.arch.InFamily(sys.ARM, sys.ARM64) {
			// Special form
			// ARM: destination register pair (R1, R2).
			// ARM64: register pair (R1, R2) for LDP/STP.

    /**
     * Deletes a crawling information record and all its associated parameters.
     * First deletes all related CrawlingInfoParam records, then deletes the main record
     * with immediate refresh to ensure consistency.
     *
     * @param crawlingInfo the crawling information entity to delete
     */
    public void delete(final CrawlingInfo crawlingInfo) {
        setupDeleteCondition(crawlingInfo);