# Help FastAPI - Get Help

Do you like **FastAPI**?

Would you like to help FastAPI, other users, and the author?

Or would you like to get help with **FastAPI**?

There are very simple ways to help (several involve just one or two clicks).

And there are several ways to get help too.

## Subscribe to the newsletter

server to create representative test cases. Or test that your code survives in
awkward-to-reproduce situations like 500 errors or slow-loading responses.


### Example

Use MockWebServer the same way that you use mocking frameworks like
[Mockito](https://github.com/mockito/mockito):

1. Script the mocks.
2. Run application code.
3. Verify that the expected requests were made.

| *Valid Range* | *Minimum value of 900. Maximum value of 31536000.* |
| *Required*    | *No*                                               |

### Policy

</ul>
<p>
Some memory operations are <i>read-like</i>, including read, atomic read, mutex lock, and channel receive.
Other memory operations are <i>write-like</i>, including write, atomic write, mutex unlock, channel send, and channel close.
Some, such as atomic compare-and-swap, are both read-like and write-like.
</p>

<p>

        } else {
            /*
             * MNG-4900: Hack to workaround deficiency of legacy API which makes it impossible for plugins to access the
             * global profile manager which is required to build a POM like a CLI invocation does. Failure to consider
             * the activated profiles can cause repo declarations to be lost which in turn will result in artifact

| *Valid Range* | *Minimum value of 900. Maximum value of 31536000.* |
| *Required*    | *No*                                               |

### Policy

        NullPointerException.class, () -> multimap().putAll(k3(), Lists.newArrayList(null, v3())));

    /*
     * In principle, a Multimap implementation could add e3 first before failing on the null. But
     * that seems unlikely enough to be worth complicating the test over, especially if there's any
     * chance that a permissive test could mask a bug.
     */
    expectUnchanged();

	"github.com/minio/madmin-go/v3"
)

// StorageAPI interface.
type StorageAPI interface {
	// Stringified version of disk.
	String() string

	// Storage operations.

	// Returns true if disk is online and its valid i.e valid format.json.
	// This has nothing to do with if the drive is hung or not responding.
	// For that individual storage API calls will fail properly. The purpose

Let's start with an example and then see it in detail.

We create an async function `lifespan()` with `yield` like this:

{* ../../docs_src/events/tutorial003.py hl[16,19] *}

 * [okhttp-staleiferror-interceptor](https://github.com/PeelTechnologies/okhttp-staleiferror-interceptor/): serve stale responses when the server isn’t reachable.
 * [okhttp-stats](https://github.com/flipkart-incubator/okhttp-stats): Get stats like average network speed.
 * [okhttp-system-keystore](https://github.com/charleskorn/okhttp-system-keystore): Use trusted certificates from the operating system keystore (Keychain on macOS, Certificate Store on Windows).