set(value) {
      field = value
      delegate.dispatcher = value.wrap()
    }

  val port: Int
    get() {
      before() // This implicitly starts the delegate.
      return delegate.port
    }

  val hostName: String
    get() {
      before() // This implicitly starts the delegate.
      return delegate.hostName
    }

  var protocolNegotiationEnabled: Boolean by delegate::protocolNegotiationEnabled

        .addEqualityGroup(
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT),
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.REPLACED))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("1", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("one", 2, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .testEquals();
  }

 * into itself leading to a stack overflow.
 *
 * A side effect of using @Typed is that it translates to explicit bindings in the container.
 * So instead of binding the component under a 'wildcard' key it is now bound with an explicit
 * key. Since this is a default component, this will be a plain binding of ModelProcessor to
 * this implementation type; that is no hint/name.
 *

   *     accepts a cause: Users of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null
   *     cause. At the moment, you can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit
   *     {@code null} cause. Note, however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents
   *     anyone from calling {@link #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a
   *     constructor that omits the cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

   *     of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null cause. At the moment, you
   *     can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit {@code null} cause. Note,
   *     however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents anyone from calling {@link
   *     #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a constructor that omits the
   *     cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

                        <relativePath>../pom.xml</relativePath>
                    </parent>
                    <artifactId>child-project</artifactId>
                    <!-- No explicit groupId - will inherit from parent -->
                    <!-- No explicit version - will inherit from parent -->
                </project>
                """;

            Document parentDoc = Document.of(parentPomXml);

    assert response.json() == "foo"


def test_required_nonable_explicit_query_invalid():
    response = client.get("/explicit-query")
    assert response.status_code == 422


def test_required_nonable_explicit_query_value():
    response = client.get("/explicit-query", params={"q": "foo"})
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == "foo"

   * Cache#invalidate}, {@link Cache#invalidateAll(Iterable)}, {@link Cache#invalidateAll()}, {@link
   * Map#remove}, {@link ConcurrentMap#remove}, or {@link Iterator#remove}.
   */
  EXPLICIT {
    @Override
    boolean wasEvicted() {
      return false;
    }
  },

  /**
   * The entry itself was not actually removed, but its value was replaced by the user. This can

    /**
     * Gets the identifiers of those profiles that should be activated by explicit demand.
     *
     * @return The identifiers of those profiles to activate, never {@code null}.
     */
    List<String> getActiveProfileIds();

    /**
     * Sets the identifiers of those profiles that should be activated by explicit demand.
     *

        assertEquals(expectedFlags, msrpcSamrOpenDomain.getFlags(), "flags should be initialized to DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG | DCERPC_LAST_FRAG");

        // Since SamrOpenDomain's constructor is called, we implicitly test that the arguments
        // are passed up. Mockito cannot directly verify super() calls without PowerMock,
        // which is not ideal for simple constructor tests.