</includes>
            <!-- By having our own entries here, we also override the default exclusion filter, which excludes all nested classes. -->
            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*PackageSanityTests.*.class]</exclude>

            </includes>
            <!-- By having our own entries here, we also override the default exclusion filter, which excludes all nested classes. -->
            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*PackageSanityTests.*.class]</exclude>

 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision
 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for

 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision
 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for

     * bufferIndex, and thus headerStart, would be 4).(NOTE: If one where
     * looking for a way to improve perfomance this is precisly what you
     * would want to do as the jcifs.smb1.netbios.SocketXxxputStream classes
     * arraycopy all data read or written into a new buffer shifted over 4!)
     */

    byte command, flags;
    int headerStart,
        length,
        batchLevel,
        errorCode,

    ImmutableDoubleArray iia = ImmutableDoubleArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> iia.get(-1));
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> iia.get(3));

    ImmutableDoubleArray sub = iia.subArray(1, 2);
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> sub.get(-1));
  }

  public void testIndexOf() {

Nós também declaramos um parâmetro especial do tipo `SecurityScopes`, importado de `fastapi.security`.

A classe `SecurityScopes` é semelhante à classe `Request` (`Request` foi utilizada para obter o objeto da requisição diretamente).

//// tab | Python 3.10+

```Python hl_lines="9  106"
{!> ../../docs_src/security/tutorial005_an_py310.py!}
```

 *
 * <h3>Building a {@code ValueGraph}</h3>
 *
 * <p>The implementation classes that {@code common.graph} provides are not public, by design. To
 * create an instance of one of the built-in implementations of {@code ValueGraph}, use the {@link
 * ValueGraphBuilder} class:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MutableValueGraph<Integer, Double> graph = ValueGraphBuilder.directed().build();
 * }</pre>
 *

 *
 * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional} (JDK 8 and higher):</b> A new {@code Optional}
 * class was added for Java 8. The two classes are extremely similar, but incompatible (they cannot
 * share a common supertype). <i>All</i> known differences are listed either here or with the
 * relevant methods below.
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>This class is serializable; {@code java.util.Optional} is not.

 * which may be a subtype of the declaring class. For example:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * Method getMethod = List.class.getMethod("get", int.class);
 * Invokable<List<String>, ?> invokable = new TypeToken<List<String>>() {}.method(getMethod);
 * assertEquals(TypeToken.of(String.class), invokable.getReturnType()); // Not Object.class!
 * assertEquals(new TypeToken<List<String>>() {}, invokable.getOwnerType());
 * }</pre>