* Lesser General Public License for more details.
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
 * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
 */
package jcifs.ntlmssp.av;

/**
 * NTLMSSP AV pair representing channel binding information for enhanced security.

 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3

/**
 * Versions of TLS that can be offered when negotiating a secure socket. See
 * [javax.net.ssl.SSLSocket.setEnabledProtocols].
 */
enum class TlsVersion(
  @get:JvmName("javaName") val javaName: String,
) {
  TLS_1_3("TLSv1.3"), // 2016.
  TLS_1_2("TLSv1.2"), // 2008.

import com.google.common.collect.testing.TestContainerGenerator;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Creates bimaps, containing sample entries, to be tested.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public interface TestBiMapGenerator<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>

<metadata xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/METADATA/1.1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/METADATA/1.1.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/metadata-1.1.0.xsd">
  <groupId>ut.simple</groupId>
  <artifactId>parent</artifactId>
  <versioning>
    <latest>1.0</latest>
    <release>1.0</release>
    <versions>
      <version>1.0</version>
    </versions>

import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A container class for the five sample elements we need for testing.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class SampleElements<E extends @Nullable Object> implements Iterable<E> {

    * Will have the next best performance, after Uvicorn. In fact, Starlette uses Uvicorn to run. So, it probably can only get "slower" than Uvicorn by having to execute more code.
    * But it provides you the tools to build simple web applications, with routing based on paths, etc.
    * If you are comparing Starlette, compare it against Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Web frameworks (or microframeworks).
* **FastAPI**:

		// Init and run test on ErasureSD backend with signature v4.
		{serverType: "ErasureSD", signer: signerV4},
		// Init and run test on ErasureSD backend, with tls enabled.
		{serverType: "ErasureSD", signer: signerV4, secure: true},
		// Init and run test on Erasure backend.
		{serverType: "Erasure", signer: signerV4},
		// Init and run test on ErasureSet backend.
		{serverType: "ErasureSet", signer: signerV4},
	}

	}

	stsEndpointURL, err := url.Parse(stsEndpoint)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatalf("Error parsing sts endpoint: %v", err)
	}

	opts := &minio.Options{
		Creds:  li,
		Secure: stsEndpointURL.Scheme == "https",
	}

	v, err := li.Get()
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatalf("Error retrieving STS credentials: %v", err)
	}

	if displayCreds {

	u, err := url.Parse(conf.Endpoint)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	creds := credentials.NewStaticV4(conf.AccessKey, conf.SecretKey, "")
	opts := &minio.Options{
		Creds:           creds,
		Secure:          u.Scheme == "https",
		Transport:       globalRemoteTargetTransport,
		TrailingHeaders: true,
	}
	client, err := minio.New(u.Host, opts)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

They are, more or less, at opposite ends, complementing each other.

Requests has a very simple and intuitive design, it's very easy to use, with sensible defaults. But at the same time, it's very powerful and customizable.

That's why, as said in the official website:

> Requests is one of the most downloaded Python packages of all time

The way you use it is very simple. For example, to do a `GET` request, you would write:

```Python