@GwtIncompatible // java.io.ObjectInputStream
  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    stream.defaultReadObject();
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    // reading data stored by writeObject
    Comparator<? super E> comparator = (Comparator<? super E>) requireNonNull(stream.readObject());
    Serialization.getFieldSetter(AbstractSortedMultiset.class, "comparator").set(this, comparator);

 *       property <i>P</i>. See, for example, the definition of {@link #intersection intersection}.
 *   <li>A {@code Range} is serializable if it has no bounds, or if each bound is serializable.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h3>Further reading</h3>
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/RangesExplained">{@code Range}</a>.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Gregory Kick
 * @since 10.0

///

### <a href="https://webargs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Webargs</a>

Another big feature required by APIs is <abbr title="reading and converting to Python data">parsing</abbr> data from incoming requests.

Webargs is a tool that was made to provide that on top of several frameworks, including Flask.

  @GwtIncompatible // java.io.ObjectInputStream
  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    stream.defaultReadObject();
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    // reading data stored by writeObject
    Comparator<? super E> comparator = (Comparator<? super E>) requireNonNull(stream.readObject());
    Serialization.getFieldSetter(AbstractSortedMultiset.class, "comparator").set(this, comparator);

in accord with this section must be in a format that is publicly
documented (and with an implementation available to the public in
source code form), and must require no special password or key for
unpacking, reading or copying.

  7. Additional Terms.

  "Additional permissions" are terms that supplement the terms of this
License by making exceptions from one or more of its conditions.

labels.jobStatus=Status
labels.labelTypeIds=Label
labels.lang=Sprache
labels.outputs=Ziel
labels.pos=POS
labels.purgeJobLogDay=Bereinige Suchprotokoll nach
labels.purgeUserInfoDay=Bereinige Benutzer nach
labels.reading=Lesen
labels.roleTypeIds=Rollen-ID
labels.scriptData=Skript
labels.scriptResult=Suchergebnis
labels.scriptType=Executor
labels.segmentation=Segmentierung
labels.startTime=Startzeitpunkt
labels.target=Ziel

🚥 👆 👟 ⚪️➡️ ➕1️⃣ 🔁 🛠️ 👈 🔨 🚫 👷 🌌 🔬 🔛 &amp; 👆 ⚙️ ⚖ 🙃 📊-🕴 *➡ 🛠️ 🔢* ⏮️ ✅ `def` 🤪 🎭 📈 (🔃 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 💓), 🙏 🗒 👈 **FastAPI** ⭐ 🔜 🔄. 👫 💼, ⚫️ 👻 ⚙️ `async def` 🚥 👆 *➡ 🛠️ 🔢* ⚙️ 📟 👈 🎭 🚧 <abbr title="Input/Output: disk reading or writing, network communications.">👤/🅾</abbr>.

, 👯‍♂️ ⚠, 🤞 👈 **FastAPI** 🔜 [⏩](index.md#_15){.internal-link target=_blank} 🌘 (⚖️ 🌘 ⭐) 👆 ⏮️ 🛠️.

### 🔗

gain (about 100 nanoseconds), please note that in **FastAPI** the effect would be quite opposite. In these cases, it's better to use `async def` unless your *path operation functions* use code that performs blocking <abbr title="Input/Output: disk reading or writing, network communications.">I/O</abbr>.

Still, in both situations, chances are that **FastAPI** will [still be faster](index.md#performance){.internal-link target=_blank} than (or at least comparable to) your previous framework....

			case ObjectNotFound, InsufficientReadQuorum:
				retryWait()
				continue
			}
			// Allow one fast retry for other errors.
			if retries > 0 {
				return entries, fmt.Errorf("reading first part metadata: %v", err)
			}
			retryWait()
			continue
		}

		partN, err := o.findFirstPart(fi)
		switch {
		case err == nil:
		case errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF):

Aún así, en ambas situaciones, es probable que **FastAPI** sea [aún más rápido](index.md#rendimiento){.Internal-link target=_blank} que (o al menos comparable) a tu framework anterior.