* nat
-N ISTIO_POSTRT
-A POSTROUTING -j ISTIO_POSTRT
-A ISTIO_POSTRT -m owner --socket-exists -p tcp -m set --match-set istio-inpod-probes-v4 dst -j SNAT --to-source 169.254.7.127

				// The time (in seconds) the connection needs to remain idle before
				// TCP starts sending keepalive probes
				_ = syscall.SetsockoptInt(fd, syscall.IPPROTO_TCP, syscall.TCP_KEEPIDLE, 15)

				// Number of probes.
				// ~ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_probes (defaults to 9, we reduce it to 5)
				_ = syscall.SetsockoptInt(fd, syscall.IPPROTO_TCP, syscall.TCP_KEEPCNT, 5)

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

## Accessing the request body in an exception handler

/// tip

To solve this same problem, it's probably a lot easier to use the `body` in a custom handler for `RequestValidationError` ([Handling Errors](../tutorial/handling-errors.md#use-the-requestvalidationerror-body){.internal-link target=_blank}).

            }

            return pb.start().waitFor();
        } catch (IOException e) {
            invokerRequest.logger().error("IO problem while executing command: " + cmdAndArguments, e);
            return 127;
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            invokerRequest.logger().error("Interrupted while executing command: " + cmdAndArguments, e);

Especificamente, para ver o Uvicorn, Starlette e FastAPI comparados entre si (entre diversas outras ferramentas).

Quanto mais simples o problema resolvido pela ferramenta, melhor será a performance. E a maioria das análises não testa funcionalidades adicionais que são oferecidas pela ferramenta.

A hierarquia é:

* **Uvicorn**: um servidor ASGI

Especificamente, observa-se Uvicorn, Starlette e FastAPI comparados juntos (entre muitas outras ferramentas).

Quanto mais simples o problema resolvido pela ferramenta, melhor a performance que ela terá. E a maioria dos _benchmarks_ não testam as características adicionais fornecidas pela ferramenta.

A hierarquia segue assim:

* **Uvicorn**: um servidor ASGI

	r.expectedMax = expectedMax
}

// AddChecksum will add checksum checks as specified in
// https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/checking-object-integrity.html
// Returns ErrInvalidChecksum if a problem with the checksum is found.
func (r *Reader) AddChecksum(req *http.Request, ignoreValue bool) error {
	cs, err := GetContentChecksum(req.Header)
	if err != nil {
		return ErrInvalidChecksum
	}
	if cs == nil {

    `@Deprecated` APIs will remain (again, unless they are `@Beta`). We have no
    plans to start removing things again, but officially, we're leaving our
    options open in case of surprises (like, say, a serious security problem).

3.  Guava has one dependency that is needed for linkage at runtime:
    `com.google.guava:failureaccess:1.0.2`. It also has
    [some annotation-only dependencies][guava-deps], which we discuss in more

    * Quelle que soit la taille de votre serveur ou la taille de chacune des applications qu'il contient.
    * Il existe cependant une solution à ce problème.
* Il existe une extension du protocole TLS (celui qui gère le cryptage au niveau TCP, avant HTTP) appelée <a
  href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication" class="external-link" target="_blank"><abbr