{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Ahora, cada vez que un navegador esté creando un usuario con una contraseña, la API devolverá la misma contraseña en el response.

En este caso, podría no ser un problema, porque es el mismo usuario que envía la contraseña.

Pero si usamos el mismo modelo para otra *path operation*, podríamos estar enviando las contraseñas de nuestros usuarios a cada cliente.

/// danger | Peligro

            fireEvent(ResolutionListener.UPDATE_SCOPE, listeners, nearest, farthestArtifact);

            // previously we cloned the artifact, but it is more efficient to just update the artifactScope
            // if problems are later discovered that the original object needs its original artifactScope value,
            // cloning may
            // again be appropriate
            nearestArtifact.setScope(farthestArtifact.getScope());

		settings = ParseTagSetting(str, ",")
	)

	// optimize match english letters and midline
	// The following code is basically called in for.
	// In order to avoid the performance problems caused by repeated compilation of regular expressions,
	// it only needs to be done once outside, so optimization is done here.
	if idx != -1 && regEnLetterAndMidline.MatchString(str[0:idx]) {
		name = str[0:idx]
	} else {

   * such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link
   * Collections#frequency}) can cause major performance problems.
   *
   * <p>The returned set's {@link Object#toString} method returns a shorthand form of the set's
   * contents, such as {@code "[1..100]}"}.
   *

pre-Go 1.24 behavior.

Go 1.24 changed the behavior of `go test -json` to emit build errors as JSON
instead of text.
These new JSON events are distinguished by new `Action` values,
but can still cause problems with CI systems that aren't robust to these events.
This behavior can be controlled with the `gotestjsonbuildtext` setting.
Using `gotestjsonbuildtext=1` restores the 1.23 behavior.

  - Health check (liveness & readiness) probes using an HTTPGetAction will no longer follow redirects to different hostnames from the original probe request. Instead, these non-local redirects will be treated as a Success (the documented behavior). In this case an event with reason "ProbeWarning" will be generated, indicating that the redirect...

	// Officially, the name and comment fields are supposed to be encoded
	// in CP-437 (which is mostly compatible with ASCII), unless the UTF-8
	// flag bit is set. However, there are several problems:
	//
	//	* Many ZIP readers still do not support UTF-8.
	//	* If the UTF-8 flag is cleared, several readers simply interpret the
	//	name and comment fields as whatever the local system encoding is.
	//

         * However, we don't expose currentFuture to users, so they can't attach listeners. And the
         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's

have both been migrated.

### gRPC Probes Graduate to Beta

With Kubernetes 1.24, the [gRPC probes functionality](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/2727)
has entered beta and is available by default. You can now [configure startup, liveness, and readiness probes](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-startup-probes/#configure-probes) for your gRPC app

* Biedt 2 interactieve documentatie-webinterfaces aan.

---

Dit was nog maar een snel overzicht, maar je zou nu toch al een idee moeten hebben over hoe het allemaal werkt.

Probeer deze regel te veranderen:

```Python
    return {"item_name": item.name, "item_id": item_id}
```

...van:

```Python
        ... "item_name": item.name ...
```

...naar: