"The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",
            "A duplicate name exists on the network.", "The network name cannot be found.", "ERRnomoreconn.", "The file exists.",

            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",
            "A duplicate name exists on the network.", "The network name cannot be found.", "ERRnomoreconn.", "The file exists.",

        // The validation in getBuffer() ensures size is within bounds (0 < size <= 1MB)
        assertTrue(buffer.length > 0, "Buffer size should be positive");
        assertTrue(buffer.length <= 0x100000, "Buffer size should not exceed 1MB");
    }

    /**
     * Test that releaseBuffer validates buffer before accepting it.
     */
    @Test

But you can have thousands of endpoints (*path operations*) using the same security system.

And all of them (or any portion of them that you want) can take advantage of re-using these dependencies or any other dependencies you create.

And all these thousands of *path operations* can be as small as 3 lines:

import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Comparator;

/**
 * Static utility methods pertaining to {@code int} primitives that interpret values as
 * <i>unsigned</i> (that is, any negative value {@code x} is treated as the positive value {@code
 * 2^32 + x}). The methods for which signedness is not an issue are in {@link Ints}, as well as
 * signed versions of methods for which signedness is an issue.
 *

                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::lastModified, -2L, "negative lastModified"),
                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::lastModified, 42L, "positive lastModified"),

                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::lastAccess, 0L, "zero lastAccess"),
                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::lastAccess, Long.MIN_VALUE, "min lastAccess"),

        buildSessionSetupBody(buf, headerStart, bodyStart, sessionFlags, secBufOffset, blob);

        int decoded = resp.decode(buf, headerStart);
        assertTrue(decoded > 0, "Decode should return positive length");

        assertEquals(NtStatus.NT_STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED, resp.getStatus());
        assertArrayEquals(blob, resp.getBlob(), "Security blob should match");

    assertFailsWith<IllegalArgumentException> {
      builder.minWebSocketMessageToCompress(-1024)
    }.also { expected ->
      assertThat(expected.message)
        .isEqualTo("minWebSocketMessageToCompress must be positive: -1024")
    }
  }

  companion object {
    private val DEFAULT_PROXY_SELECTOR = ProxySelector.getDefault()
    private val DEFAULT_COOKIE_HANDLER = CookieManager.getDefault()

func (b BatchJobSnowball) Validate() error {
	if *b.Batch <= 0 {
		return BatchJobYamlErr{
			line: b.line,
			col:  b.col,
			msg:  "batch number should be non positive zero",
		}
	}
	_, err := humanize.ParseBytes(*b.SmallerThan)
	if err != nil {
		return BatchJobYamlErr{
			line: b.line,
			col:  b.col,
			msg:  err.Error(),
		}
	}
	return nil
}

    }
  }

  static void checkExactMatches(CharMatcher m, char[] chars) {
    Set<Character> positive = Sets.newHashSetWithExpectedSize(chars.length);
    for (char c : chars) {
      positive.add(c);
    }
    for (int c = 0; c <= Character.MAX_VALUE; c++) {
      assertFalse(positive.contains(Character.valueOf((char) c)) ^ m.matches((char) c));
    }
  }