import jcifs.internal.smb1.AndXServerMessageBlock;
import jcifs.internal.util.SMBUtil;
import jcifs.util.Hexdump;

/**
 * SMB1 NT Create AndX Response message.
 *
 * This response contains information about the created or opened file,
 * including file handle, attributes, and creation disposition.
 */
public class SmbComNTCreateAndXResponse extends AndXServerMessageBlock implements SmbBasicFileInfo {

 *       under all environments. We could fight this by fully qualifying the annotation, but the
 *       result will be verbose and attention-grabbing.
 *   <li>We need to be careful about how we suppress {@code suite()} methods in {@code common.io}.
 *       The generated suite for {@code FooTest} ends up containing {@code FooTest} itself plus some

           *
           * ...when we build with JDK 22 and run under JDK 8.
           */
          || info.getName().contains("MultimapsTest")
      /*
       * Luckily, we don't care about analyzing tests at all. We'd skip them all if we could do so
       * trivially, but it's enough to skip these ones.
       */
      ) {
        continue;
      }
      Class<?> clazz = info.load();
      try {

   * the entry was returned by the iterator, except through the setValue operation on the map entry"
   * As such, this field must be cleared before every map mutation.
   *
   * Note about volatile: volatile doesn't make it safe to read from a mutable graph in one thread
   * while writing to it in another. All it does is help with _reading_ from multiple threads

import jcifs.internal.SmbBasicFileInfo;
import jcifs.internal.smb1.AndXServerMessageBlock;
import jcifs.internal.util.SMBUtil;

/**
 * SMB1 Open AndX Response message.
 *
 * This response contains information about the opened file,
 * including file ID, attributes, size, and access permissions.
 */
public class SmbComOpenAndXResponse extends AndXServerMessageBlock implements SmbBasicFileInfo {

     * we can override it in our non-null-guaranteeing subtypes to present a better signature to
     * their users.
     *
     * However, the checker *we* use has this special knowledge about `Collection.toArray()` anyway,
     * so in our implementation code, we can rely on that. That's why the expression below
     * type-checks.
     */
    return super.toArray();
  }

   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {

            throw new GraphConflictResolutionException("graph with an entry, but not vertices do not exist");
        }

        if (graph.isEmptyEdges()) {
            return null; // no edges - nothing to worry about
        }

        final TreeSet<MetadataGraphVertex> vertices = graph.getVertices();

        try {
            // edge case - single vertex graph
            if (vertices.size() == 1) {

# /---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# outsideSqlMap: (NotRequired - Default map:{})
#
# The various settings about outsideSql. 
#
# o isGenerateProcedureParameterBean: (NotRequired - Default false)
# o isGenerateProcedureCustomizeEntity: (NotRequired - Default false)
# o targetProcedureCatalogList: (NotRequired - Default list:{})
# o targetProcedureSchemaList: (NotRequired - Default list:{})

   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {
    CountDownLatch finalizerRan = new CountDownLatch(1);
    WeakReference<Object> ref =
        new WeakReference<Object>(
            new Object() {