// This is expected behavior since they're created with the same configuration
        assertEquals(response1.toString(), response2.toString());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("All write methods should consistently return 0")
    void testAllWriteMethodsReturnZero() {
        // Arrange
        byte[] buffer = new byte[100];

        // Act & Assert
        assertEquals(0, response.writeSetupWireFormat(buffer, 0));

        assertEquals("parentdomain", testConfig.getDefaultDomain()); // Inherited
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should validate configuration consistency")
    void testConfigurationValidation() throws CIFSException {
        // Given
        Properties props = new Properties();
        props.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.minVersion", "SMB311");

Pero ahora que FastAPI 0.99.0 y superiores usa OpenAPI 3.1.0, que usa JSON Schema 2020-12, y Swagger UI 5.0.0 y superiores, todo es más consistente y los ejemplos se incluyen en JSON Schema.

### Swagger UI y `examples` específicos de OpenAPI { #swagger-ui-and-openapi-specific-examples }

Mas agora que o FastAPI 0.99.0 e superiores usam o OpenAPI 3.1.0, que usa o JSON Schema 2020-12, e o Swagger UI 5.0.0 e superiores, tudo é mais consistente e os exemplos são incluídos no JSON Schema.

### Swagger UI e `examples` específicos do OpenAPI { #swagger-ui-and-openapi-specific-examples }

   * consistently between their order within {@code valuesInExpectedOrder} and the order implied by
   * the given {@code comparator}.
   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder}; and
   *   <li><i>consistency</i>: {@code comparator.compare(ti, tj) < 0} and {@code

   * @return all the constraints implicitly or explicitly required by the class or any of its
   *     superclasses.
   * @throws ConflictingRequirementsException if the requirements are mutually inconsistent.
   */
  public static TesterRequirements getTesterRequirements(Class<?> testerClass)
      throws ConflictingRequirementsException {
    synchronized (classTesterRequirementsCache) {

            }
        } else if (since instanceof SinceTagStatus.Inconsistent inconsistent) {
            return acceptOrReject(member, Violation.error(member, String.format(SINCE_INCONSISTENT_ERROR_MESSAGE, inconsistent.getVersions())));
        } else if (since instanceof SinceTagStatus.NotNeeded) {
            return null;

   * consistently between their order within {@code valuesInExpectedOrder} and the order implied by
   * the given {@code comparator}.
   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder}; and
   *   <li><i>consistency</i>: {@code comparator.compare(ti, tj) < 0} and {@code

    @Test
    @DisplayName("EmptyIterator should behave consistently across multiple calls")
    void testConsistentBehavior() {
        // When & Then - test multiple sequential calls
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            assertFalse(emptyIterator.hasNext(), "hasNext should consistently return false");
            assertNull(emptyIterator.next(), "next should consistently return null");
        }
    }

    @RepeatedTest(5)

     * The value is converted to lowercase for consistency.
     *
     * @return the operating system name (never null)
     */
    @Nonnull
    String name();

    /**
     * Returns the OS architecture as reported by the system property "os.arch".
     * The value is converted to lowercase for consistency.
     *
     * @return the operating system architecture (never null)
     */