map = MutableClassToInstanceMap.create();
  }

  public void testConstraint() {

    /**
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

    newRoutePlanner: Boolean,
    chain: RealInterceptorChain,
  ) {
    check(interceptorScopedExchange == null)

    this.withLock {
      check(!responseBodyOpen) {
        "cannot make a new request because the previous response is still open: " +
          "please call response.close()"
      }
      check(!requestBodyOpen)
    }

    if (newRoutePlanner) {
      val routePlanner =
        RealRoutePlanner(

The domains are securely verified and the certificates are generated automatically. This also allows automating the renewal of these certificates.

                logger.debug("Waiting for {}.", getName());
            }
            if (!p.waitFor(commandTimeout + commandDestroyTimeout, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)) {
                logger.warn("Destroying {} because of the process timeout.", getName());
                p.destroy();
            }

            final int exitValue = p.exitValue();
            if (exitValue != 0) {

  // 2. In done() where we may propagate cancellation to the input. In this case it is _not_ fine.
  //    There is currently nothing that enforces that the write to inputFuture in the constructor is
  //    visible to done(). This is because there is no happens before edge between the write and a
  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,

    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose set has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the set may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubsetSuite(

  protected Queue<String> create() {
    TestQueue<String> inner = new TestQueue<>();
    Queue<String> outer = Synchronized.queue(inner, inner.mutex);
    outer.add("foo"); // necessary because we try to remove elements later on
    return outer;
  }

  private static final class TestQueue<E> implements Queue<E> {
    private final Queue<E> delegate = Lists.newLinkedList();

    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Start the task to put it in the RUNNING state.  Have to use a separate
    // thread because the task will block on the task latch after unblocking
    // the run latch.
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());

    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose set has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the set may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubsetSuite(

```sh
mc admin replicate info minio1
```

** Note **
Previously, site replication required the root credentials of peer sites to be identical. This is no longer necessary because STS tokens are now signed with the site replicator service account credentials, thus allowing flexibility in the independent management of root accounts across sites and the ability to disable root accounts eventually.