if (seenExceptionsLocal == null) {
      // TODO(cpovirk): Should we use a simpler (presumably cheaper) data structure?
      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *

    //    [a1, a2, a3, b1, b2], [a1, b2, a2, a3, b2], [a1, b2, b3, a2, a3], etc.)
    // 2. It's possible for subscribers to actually be dispatched to in a different order than they
    //    were added to the queue. It's easily possible for one thread to take the head of the
    //    queue, immediately followed by another thread taking the next element in the queue. That

   * IllegalArgumentException} if passed a {@code fromElement} smaller than an earlier {@code
   * fromElement}. However, this method doesn't throw an exception in that situation, but instead
   * keeps the original {@code fromElement}. Similarly, this method keeps the original {@code
   * toElement}, instead of throwing an exception, if passed a {@code toElement} greater than an
   * earlier {@code toElement}.
   */
  @Override

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(double[] array, int distance) {

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is somewhat faster.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(byte[] array, int distance) {

# Aktuellen Benutzer abrufen

Im vorherigen Kapitel hat das Sicherheitssystem (das auf dem Dependency Injection System basiert) der *Pfadoperation-Funktion* einen `token` vom Typ `str` überreicht:

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python hl_lines="12"
{!> ../../docs_src/security/tutorial001_an_py39.py!}
```

////

//// tab | Python 3.8+

```Python hl_lines="11"
{!> ../../docs_src/security/tutorial001_an.py!}
```

////

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(double[] array, int distance) {

 * information among plugins, is this more like an extension point - do we need a sort of bus for
 * application data - do we need a dictionary for our applications like Apple does. We could easily
 * hook into this and this is the model we need to follow - how many of our REST services do not map
 * directory to a method in the application interface?
 *
 * - research extension points versus plugins
 *