assertTrue("Message should mention userDict file",
                    e.getMessage().contains("userDict") || e.getMessage().contains("Failed to write"));
        } finally {
            // Ensure proper cleanup
            if (updater != null) {
                try {
                    updater.close();
                } catch (Exception e) {
                    // Ignore cleanup exceptions in test

    @Test
    @DisplayName("writeBytesWireFormat should write correct structure")
    void testWriteBytesWireFormat() {
        byte[] buffer = new byte[256];
        int offset = 64; // Start at offset to test proper indexing

        int written = request.writeBytesWireFormat(buffer, offset);

        // Verify bytes written
        assertEquals(24, written);

        // Verify structure size (should be 24)

c(t){try{return document.execCommand(t)}catch(t){return}}var a=function(t){t=r()(t);return c("cut"),t};function o(t,e){var n,o,t=(n=t,o="rtl"===document.documentElement.getAttribute("dir"),(t=document.createElement("textarea")).style.fontSize="12pt",t.style.border="0",t.style.padding="0",t.style.margin="0",t.style.position="absolute",t.style[o?"right":"left"]="-9999px",o=window.pageYOffset||document.documentElement.scrollTop,t.style.top="".concat(o,"px"),t.setAttribute("readonly",""),t.value=n,t);return e....

        out.println("<b><a class=\"plain\" href=\".\">normal</a> | <a class=\"plain\" href=\"?fmt=detail\">detailed</a></b>");
        out.println("<p><table border='0' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0'><tr><td>");

        out.print("<A style=\"width: " + maxLen);
        out.print("; height: 18;\" HREF=\"");
        out.print(path);
        out.println("\"><b>&uarr;</b></a>");

///

Wir verwenden dieses Modell, um sowohl unsere Eingabe- als auch Ausgabedaten zu deklarieren:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Immer wenn jetzt ein Browser einen Benutzer mit Passwort erzeugt, gibt die API dasselbe Passwort in der Response zurück.

Hier ist das möglicherweise kein Problem, da es derselbe Benutzer ist, der das Passwort sendet.

      factory.setAccessible(true);
    }
    // Sorts methods/constructors with the least number of parameters first since it's likely easier
    // to fill dummy parameter values for them. Ties are broken by name then by the string form of
    // the parameter list.
    return BY_NUMBER_OF_PARAMETERS
        .compound(BY_METHOD_NAME)
        .compound(BY_PARAMETERS)
        .immutableSortedCopy(factories);
  }

Aber sie erleichtert die Arbeit mit asynchronem Code erheblich.

Die gleiche Syntax (oder fast identisch) wurde kürzlich auch in moderne Versionen von JavaScript (im Browser und in NodeJS) aufgenommen.

Davor war der Umgang mit asynchronem Code jedoch deutlich komplexer und schwieriger.

          return false;
        }
        i++;
      }
      return true;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object object) {
      // Warning: this is broken if size() == 0, so it is critical that we
      // substitute an empty ImmutableSet to the user in place of this
      if (object instanceof CartesianSet) {
        CartesianSet<?> that = (CartesianSet<?>) object;

 * For other types, the conversion uses the string representation of the source object.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * If no pattern is specified, the pattern used for conversion depends on the locale as follows:
 * </p>
 * <table border="1">
 * <caption>Conversion Patterns</caption>
 * <tr>
 * <th>Category</th>
 * <th>Pattern</th>
 * <th>Example for {@link Locale#JAPANESE}</th>
 * </tr>
 * <tr>

 * </p>
 * <p>
 * If no pattern is specified, the pattern used for conversion depends on the locale as follows:
 * </p>
 * <table border="1">
 * <caption>Conversion Patterns</caption>
 * <tr>
 * <th>Category</th>
 * <th>Pattern</th>
 * <th>Example for {@link Locale#JAPANESE}</th>
 * </tr>
 * <tr>