*
 * <p>The size of the data structure used by {@link ArrayBasedCharEscaper} is proportional to the
 * highest valued character that requires escaping. For example a replacement map containing the
 * single character '{@code \}{@code u1000}' will require approximately 16K of memory. If you need
 * to create multiple escaper instances that have the same character replacement mapping consider
 * using {@link ArrayBasedEscaperMap}.

	if err != nil {
		err = msgp.WrapError(err, "dataVersion")
		return
	}
	return
}

// MarshalMsg implements msgp.Marshaler
func (z *metacache) MarshalMsg(b []byte) (o []byte, err error) {
	o = msgp.Require(b, z.Msgsize())
	// map header, size 13
	// string "end"
	o = append(o, 0x8d, 0xa3, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x64)
	o = msgp.AppendTime(o, z.ended)
	// string "st"
	o = append(o, 0xa2, 0x73, 0x74)

        Simple fixes in single PRs do not require issues. 
  
        **Do you use the latest project version?**

  - type: input
    id: version
    attributes:
      label: Affected version
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: message
    attributes:
      label: Bug description
    validations:

// "s3:Replication:OperationCompletedReplication" is a MinIO extension.
type Name int

// Values of event Name
const (
	// Single event types (does not require expansion)

	ObjectAccessedGet Name = 1 + iota
	ObjectAccessedGetRetention
	ObjectAccessedGetLegalHold
	ObjectAccessedHead
	ObjectAccessedAttributes
	ObjectCreatedCompleteMultipartUpload
	ObjectCreatedCopy

     * supported, but SHA-256 is preferred.
     */
    @JvmStatic
    fun pin(certificate: Certificate): String {
      require(certificate is X509Certificate) { "Certificate pinning requires X509 certificates" }
      return "sha256/${certificate.sha256Hash().base64()}"
    }
  }

import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Use this to meta-annotate {@code XxxFeature.Require} annotations, so that those annotations can
 * be used to decide whether to apply a test to a given class-under-test.
 *
 * <p>This is needed because annotations can't implement interfaces, which is also why reflection is

import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Use this to meta-annotate {@code XxxFeature.Require} annotations, so that those annotations can
 * be used to decide whether to apply a test to a given class-under-test.
 *
 * <p>This is needed because annotations can't implement interfaces, which is also why reflection is

			err = msgp.WrapError(err, zb0007, "UpdatedAt")
			return
		}
	}
	return
}

// MarshalMsg implements msgp.Marshaler
func (z DailyAllTierStats) MarshalMsg(b []byte) (o []byte, err error) {
	o = msgp.Require(b, z.Msgsize())
	o = msgp.AppendMapHeader(o, uint32(len(z)))
	for zb0007, zb0008 := range z {
		o = msgp.AppendString(o, zb0007)
		// map header, size 2
		// string "Bins"

		err = msgp.WrapError(err, "Context")
		return
	}
	return
}

// MarshalMsg implements msgp.Marshaler
func (z BatchJobKeyRotateEncryption) MarshalMsg(b []byte) (o []byte, err error) {
	o = msgp.Require(b, z.Msgsize())
	// map header, size 3
	// string "Type"
	o = append(o, 0x83, 0xa4, 0x54, 0x79, 0x70, 0x65)
	o = msgp.AppendString(o, string(z.Type))
	// string "Key"
	o = append(o, 0xa3, 0x4b, 0x65, 0x79)

cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator ([CSPRNG](#csprng)). However, in the context of SSE, the MinIO server does not require that the CSPRNG generates values that are indistinguishable from truly random bit strings. Instead, it is sufficient if the generated values are unique - which is a weaker requirement. Nevertheless other parts - for example the TLS-stack - may require that CSPRNG-generated values are indistinguishable from truly random bit strings.

### Server-Side Encryption with...