/></option>
						<option value="pdf" <c:if test="${as.filetype.contains('pdf')}">selected</c:if>><la:message
								key="labels.advance_search_filetype_pdf"
							/></option>
						<option value="word" <c:if test="${as.filetype.contains('word')}">selected</c:if>><la:message
								key="labels.advance_search_filetype_word"
							/></option>
						<option value="excel" <c:if test="${as.filetype.contains('excel')}">selected</c:if>><la:message

        String a = "1-0.alpha";
        String b = "1-0.beta";
        String c = "1";

        checkVersionsOrder(a, c); // Now a < c, but before MNG-6964 they were equal
        checkVersionsOrder(b, c); // Now b < c, but before MNG-6964 they were equal
        checkVersionsOrder(a, b); // Should still be true
    }

    @Test
    void testLocaleIndependent() {
        Locale orig = Locale.getDefault();

//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, int($4.Reg), &$6);
//	}
	ADDD	F1, F2, F3

//	LFCMP freg ',' freg
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, 0, &$4);
//	}
	CMPEQD	F1, F2


//
// WORD
//
	WORD	$1	// 00000001
	NOOP		// 00000000
	SYNC		// 0000000f

//
// NOP
//
//	LNOP comma // asm doesn't support the trailing comma.
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &nullgen, 0, &nullgen);
//	}

   * EndpointPair [N4, N4] - return
   * Visited Nodes = {N1, N2, N3, N4}
   * </pre>
   */
  private static final class Undirected<N> extends EndpointPairIterator<N> {
    // It's a little weird that we add `null` to this set, but it makes for slightly simpler code.
    private @Nullable Set<@Nullable N> visitedNodes;

    private Undirected(BaseGraph<N> graph) {
      super(graph);

        // Instead, we verify the interaction with the DcerpcHandle and the return value.
        // The fact that the constructor completes without exception and sets 'opened' to true
        // implies the correct parameters were used internally.
    }

    @Test
    void constructor_shouldThrowSmbExceptionOnOpenFailure() throws IOException {
        // Arrange
        int access = 1;
        int rid = 100;

        int written = close.writeParameterWordsWireFormat(buffer, 0);
        assertEquals(6, written, "writeParameterWordsWireFormat should return 6");
        // Only compare the first 6 bytes that were actually written
        byte[] actualWritten = new byte[6];
        System.arraycopy(buffer, 0, actualWritten, 0, 6);
        assertArrayEquals(expected, actualWritten, "wire format should match expectation");
    }

 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class HttpHeadersTest extends TestCase {

  public void testConstantNameMatchesString() throws Exception {
    // Special case some of the weird HTTP Header names...
    ImmutableBiMap<String, String> specialCases =
        ImmutableBiMap.<String, String>builder()
            .put("CDN_LOOP", "CDN-Loop")
            .put("ETAG", "ETag")

  static final String NODE_REMOVED_FROM_GRAPH =
      "Node %s that was used to generate this set is no longer in the graph.";
  static final String NODE_PAIR_REMOVED_FROM_GRAPH =
      "Node %s or node %s that were used to generate this set are no longer in the graph.";
  static final String EDGE_REMOVED_FROM_GRAPH =
      "Edge %s that was used to generate this set is no longer in the graph.";
  static final String REUSING_EDGE =

            // MID checking not required here as we only read responses for which we're waiting
            // We only read what we were waiting for, so first guess would be no.
            final boolean verify = dgst.verify(buffer, i, size, 0, this);
            this.verifyFailed = verify;
            return !verify;
        }
        return true;

At that point, by noticing that the server took some microseconds longer to send the "Incorrect username or password" response, the attackers will know that they got _something_ right, some of the initial letters were right.

And then they can try again knowing that it's probably something more similar to `stanleyjobsox` than to `johndoe`.

#### A "professional" attack { #a-professional-attack }