* #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

        byte[] buffer1 = testCache.getBuffer();
        byte[] buffer2 = testCache.getBuffer();

        // Then
        assertNotNull(buffer1, "First buffer should not be null");
        assertNotNull(buffer2, "Second buffer should not be null");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer1.length, "Buffer should have expected size");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer2.length, "Buffer should have expected size");

	configLock.RLock()
	r.Header.Set(xhttp.SubnetAPIKey, c.APIKey)
	configLock.RUnlock()
	r.Header.Set(xhttp.MinioDeploymentID, xhttp.GlobalDeploymentID)

	client := &http.Client{
		Timeout:   10 * time.Second,
		Transport: c.transport,
	}

	resp, err := client.Do(r)
	if err != nil {
		return "", err
	}
	defer xhttp.DrainBody(resp.Body)

	respBytes, err := io.ReadAll(io.LimitReader(resp.Body, respBodyLimit))

  tensorflow::AttrValueMap::const_iterator attr_found = attr_values.find("T");
  EXPECT_NE(attr_found, attr_values.cend());
  EXPECT_EQ(attr_found->second.list().type(0), tensorflow::DataType::DT_BOOL);
  EXPECT_EQ(attr_found->second.list().type(1), tensorflow::DataType::DT_FLOAT);
  EXPECT_EQ(attr_found->second.list().type(2), tensorflow::DataType::DT_INT32);

  TFE_TensorHandle* retvals[1] = {nullptr};
  int num_retvals = 1;

	$MC_COMMAND
	STATUS=$?
	until [ $STATUS = 0 ]; do
		ATTEMPTS=$(expr $ATTEMPTS + 1)
		echo \"Failed attempts: $ATTEMPTS\"
		if [ $ATTEMPTS -gt $LIMIT ]; then
			exit 1
		fi
		sleep 2 # 1 second intervals between attempts
		$MC_COMMAND
		STATUS=$?
	done
	set -e # reset `e` as active
	return 0
}

# checkBucketExists ($bucket)
# Check if the bucket exists, by using the exit code of `mc ls`

    // Resource state changed - may need to reconnect
    log.info("Resource change detected for: {}", notification.getResourceName());
    
    // Schedule reconnection attempt
    scheduleReconnection(1000);  // 1 second delay
}

private void handleClientMove(WitnessNotification notification) {
    // Server is asking client to move to different node
    log.info("Client move requested for resource: {}", notification.getResourceName());

        HotThreadMonitorTarget target2 = new HotThreadMonitorTarget();

        assertNotNull(target1, "First instance should not be null");
        assertNotNull(target2, "Second instance should not be null");
        assertNotSame(target1, target2, "Instances should be different objects");
    }

    @Test
    public void test_class_has_proper_annotations() {

 * #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

  STATUS=$? ;
  until [ $STATUS = 0 ]
  do
    ATTEMPTS=`expr $ATTEMPTS + 1` ;
    echo \"Failed attempts: $ATTEMPTS\" ;
    if [ $ATTEMPTS -gt $LIMIT ]; then
      exit 1 ;
    fi ;
    sleep 2 ; # 1 second intervals between attempts
    $MC_COMMAND ;
    STATUS=$? ;
  done ;
  set -e ; # reset `e` as active
  return 0
}

# checkUserExists ()

            assertTrue(processHelper.isProcessRunning(sessionId));

            // Start second process with same session ID (should replace first)
            JobProcess jobProcess2 = processHelper.startProcess(sessionId, cmdList2, pbCall);
            assertNotNull(jobProcess2);

            // Wait for second process to be running
            Thread.sleep(100);