*/
    public static final int SMB2_IMPERSONATION_LEVEL_ANONYMOUS = 0x0;

    /**
     * Identification impersonation level - server can obtain the client's identity but cannot impersonate
     */
    public static final int SMB2_IMPERSONATION_LEVEL_IDENTIFICATION = 0x1;

    /**
     * Impersonation level - server can impersonate the client's security context on the local system

   * encounter order.
   *
   * @since 21.0
   */
  public static <E> Collector<E, ?, ImmutableMultiset<E>> toImmutableMultiset() {
    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableMultiset(Function.identity(), e -> 1);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code Collector} that accumulates elements into an {@code ImmutableMultiset} whose
   * elements are the result of applying {@code elementFunction} to the inputs, with counts equal to

## **2. Prerequisites**

                .flatMap(p -> p.getProfiles().stream())
                .map(Profile::getId);

        return Stream.of(projectProfiles, settingsProfiles, superPomProfiles)
                .flatMap(Function.identity())
                .collect(toSet());
    }

    /**
     * Check whether the required profiles were found in any of the projects we're building or the settings.
     * @param session the Maven session.

Next, we create a `HeroPublic` model, this is the one that will be **returned** to the clients of the API.

It has the same fields as `HeroBase`, so it won't include `secret_name`.

Finally, the identity of our heroes is protected! 🥷

It also re-declares `id: int`. By doing this, we are making a **contract** with the API clients, so that they can always expect the `id` to be there and to be an `int` (it will never be `None`).

- CustomResourceDefinition schemas that use `x-kubernetes-list-map-keys` to specify properties that uniquely identify list items must make those properties required or have a default value, to ensure those properties are present for all list items. See https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/api-concepts/#merge-strategy for details. ([#88076](https://git...

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(int[], int[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.
   */

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to

   * name, even if their bounds differ.
   *
   * <p>While resolving a type variable from a {@code var -> type} map, we don't care whether the
   * type variable's bound has been partially resolved. As long as the type variable "identity"
   * matches.
   *
   * <p>On the other hand, if for example we are resolving {@code List<A extends B>} to {@code
   * List<A extends String>}, we need to compare that {@code <A extends B>} is unequal to {@code <A