* whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

  CollectionSize(int numElements) {
    this.implied = emptySet();
    this.numElements = numElements;
  }

  CollectionSize(Feature<? super Collection>... implied) {
    // Keep the order here, so that PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder
    // gives a predictable order of test suites.
    this.implied = copyToSet(implied);
    this.numElements = null;
  }

  @Override

  CollectionSize(int numElements) {
    this.implied = emptySet();
    this.numElements = numElements;
  }

  CollectionSize(Feature<? super Collection>... implied) {
    // Keep the order here, so that PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder
    // gives a predictable order of test suites.
    this.implied = copyToSet(implied);
    this.numElements = null;
  }

  @Override

 * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
 * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
 * distributed with this work for additional information
 * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
 * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
 * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
 * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getSetNullSupportedMethod() {

  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)
  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  /*
   * ListMultimap.asMap essentially returns a Map<K, List<V>>; we just can't declare it that way.
   * Thus, calls like asMap().values().remove(someList) are safe because they are comparing a list
   * to a collection of other lists.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("CollectionUndefinedEquality")
  public void testValuesRemove() {

  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)
  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  /*
   * ListMultimap.asMap essentially returns a Map<K, List<V>>; we just can't declare it that way.
   * Thus, calls like asMap().values().remove(someList) are safe because they are comparing a list
   * to a collection of other lists.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("CollectionUndefinedEquality")
  public void testValuesRemove() {

   * that conversion is safe.
   *
   * <p>This method is intended to help with usages of type parameters that have {@linkplain
   * ParametricNullness parametric nullness}. If a type parameter instead ranges over only non-null
   * types (or if the type is a non-variable type, like {@code String}), then code should almost
   * never use this method, preferring instead to call {@code requireNonNull} so as to benefit from

   * that conversion is safe.
   *
   * <p>This method is intended to help with usages of type parameters that have {@linkplain
   * ParametricNullness parametric nullness}. If a type parameter instead ranges over only non-null
   * types (or if the type is a non-variable type, like {@code String}), then code should almost
   * never use this method, preferring instead to call {@code requireNonNull} so as to benefit from