* [fluentd-gcp addon] Bump fluentd-gcp-scaler to v0.5.1 to pick up security fixes.
    * [fluentd-gcp addon] Bump event-exporter to v0.2.4 to pick up security fixes.
    * [fluentd-gcp addon] Bump prometheus-to-sd to v0.5.0 to pick up security fixes.

* The kubelet API is now secured, only cluster admins are allowed to access it.
* Insecure access to the API Server over `localhost:8080` is now disabled.
* The control plane components now talk securely to each other. The API Server talks securely to the kubelets in the cluster.

import jcifs.CIFSException;
import jcifs.DialectVersion;

/**
 * Security configuration tests
 *
 * Verifies that default security settings are properly configured
 * according to SMB security best practices.
 */
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class SecurityConfigurationTest {

    /**
     * Test that default security settings meet minimum security requirements
     */
    @Test

## Recap { #recap }

You now have the tools to implement a complete security system based on `username` and `password` for your API.

Using these tools, you can make the security system compatible with any database and with any user or data model.

The only detail missing is that it is not actually "secure" yet.

With what you have seen up to now, you can set up a secure **FastAPI** application using standards like OAuth2 and JWT.

In almost any framework handling the security becomes a rather complex subject quite quickly.

Many packages that simplify it a lot have to make many compromises with the data model, database, and available features. And some of these packages that simplify things too much actually have security flaws underneath.

---

 * `COMPATIBLE_TLS` is a secure configuration that connects to secure–but not current–HTTPS servers.
 * `CLEARTEXT` is an insecure configuration that is used for `http://` URLs.

These loosely follow the model set in [Google Cloud Policies](https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/ssl-policies-concepts). We [track changes](../security/tls_configuration_history.md) to this policy.

import java.io.IOException
import java.security.KeyStore
import java.security.SecureRandom
import java.security.Security
import javax.net.ssl.KeyManagerFactory
import javax.net.ssl.KeyStoreBuilderParameters
import javax.net.ssl.SSLContext
import javax.net.ssl.X509ExtendedKeyManager
import javax.security.auth.callback.Callback
import javax.security.auth.callback.CallbackHandler
import javax.security.auth.callback.PasswordCallback

## About security, APIs, and docs { #about-security-apis-and-docs }

Hiding your documentation user interfaces in production *shouldn't* be the way to protect your API.

That doesn't add any extra security to your API, the *path operations* will still be available where they are.

If there's a security flaw in your code, it will still exist.

import java.net.Proxy
import java.net.ProxySelector
import java.net.Socket
import java.net.URI
import java.net.URL
import java.nio.charset.Charset
import java.security.KeyPair
import java.security.Principal
import java.security.cert.Certificate
import java.security.cert.X509Certificate
import javax.net.ServerSocketFactory
import javax.net.SocketFactory
import javax.net.ssl.HostnameVerifier
import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocket

 *
 * <p>This package contains interfaces and classes for the password encryption tool,
 * which helps secure sensitive information in Maven settings and configuration files.</p>
 *
 * <p>Key features include:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Password encryption and decryption</li>
 *   <li>Master password management</li>
 *   <li>Security settings configuration</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNENC_CMD