int bytesWritten = transCallNamedPipe.writeDataWireFormat(dst, 0);

        // Then
        assertEquals(0, bytesWritten);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeDataWireFormat with exactly fitting buffer")
    void testWriteDataWireFormatExactBuffer() {
        // Given
        transCallNamedPipe = new TransCallNamedPipe(mockConfig, TEST_PIPE_NAME, TEST_DATA, 0, TEST_DATA.length);

  for (i in 0 until length) {
    val c = this[i]
    if (c <= '\u001f' || c >= '\u007f') {
      return i
    }
  }
  return -1
}

/** Returns true if we should void putting this this header in an exception or toString(). */
internal fun isSensitiveHeader(name: String): Boolean =
  name.equals("Authorization", ignoreCase = true) ||
    name.equals("Cookie", ignoreCase = true) ||

  \"-Dlibrary.jline.path=${MAVEN_HOME}/lib/jline-native\" \
  \"-Dmaven.multiModuleProjectDirectory=$MAVEN_PROJECTBASEDIR\" \
  $LAUNCHER_CLASS \
  $MAVEN_ARGS"
# Add remaining arguments with proper quoting
for arg in "$@"; do
    cmd="$cmd \"$arg\""
done

# Debug: print the command that will be executed
#echo "About to execute:"
#echo "$cmd"

### Compilation

Compiling models via the recommended entry points described in
[XLA](https://www.tensorflow.org/xla) and
[JAX](https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/jax-101/02-jitting.html)
documentation should be safe, while some of the testing and debugging tools that
come with the compiler are not designed to be used with untrusted data and
should be used with caution when working with untrusted models.

        addrEntry = new NbtAddress[rDataLength / 6];
        end = srcIndex + rDataLength;
        /* Apparently readRDataWireFormat can return 0 if resultCode != 0 in
        which case this will look indefinitely. Putting this else clause around
        the loop might fix that. But I would need to see a capture to confirm.
        if (resultCode != 0) {
            srcIndex += rDataLength;
        } else {
        */

### `Union` in Python 3.10 { #union-in-python-3-10 }

In this example we pass `Union[PlaneItem, CarItem]` as the value of the argument `response_model`.

Because we are passing it as a **value to an argument** instead of putting it in a **type annotation**, we have to use `Union` even in Python 3.10.

If it was in a type annotation we could have used the vertical bar, as:

```Python
some_variable: PlaneItem | CarItem
```

        end = srcIndex + this.rDataLength;
        /*
         * Apparently readRDataWireFormat can return 0 if resultCode != 0 in
         * which case this will look indefinitely. Putting this else clause around
         * the loop might fix that. But I would need to see a capture to confirm.
         * if (resultCode != 0) {
         * srcIndex += rDataLength;
         * } else {
         */

    /**
     * Default mode for combining children DOMs during merge.
     * When element names match, the process will try to merge the element data,
     * rather than putting the dominant and recessive elements as siblings.
     */
    public static final String DEFAULT_CHILDREN_COMBINATION_MODE = CHILDREN_COMBINATION_MERGE;

    /** Attribute name controlling how the element itself is combined */

import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Implementation detail for the internal structure of {@link Range} instances. Represents a unique
 * way of "cutting" a "number line" (actually of instances of type {@code C}, not necessarily
 * "numbers") into two sections; this can be done below a certain value, above a certain value,

	deprecated  map[token.Pos]bool
	features    map[string]bool              // set
	imported    map[string]*apiPackage       // packages already imported
	stdPackages []string                     // names, omitting "unsafe", internal, and vendored packages
	importMap   map[string]map[string]string // importer dir -> import path -> canonical path
	importDir   map[string]string            // canonical import path -> dir

}