### Summary { #summary }

I used to say I didn't like history that much... and look at me now giving "tech history" lessons. 😅

        token_url, data=data, verify=False,
        allow_redirects=False, auth=(client_id, client_secret))

    print('body: ' + id_token_response.text)

    # we can now use the id_token as much as we want to access protected resources.
    tokens = json.loads(id_token_response.text)
    id_token = tokens['id_token']

    response = sts_client.assume_role_with_web_identity(

/// info

Keep in mind that dataclasses can't do everything Pydantic models can do.

So, you might still need to use Pydantic models.

But if you have a bunch of dataclasses laying around, this is a nice trick to use them to power a web API using FastAPI. 🤓

///

## Dataclasses in `response_model` { #dataclasses-in-response-model }

import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.util.Random;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utilities for benchmarks.
 *
 * <p>In many cases, we wish to vary the order of magnitude of the input as much as we want to vary
 * the input itself, so most methods which generate values use an exponential distribution varying
 * the order of magnitude of the generated values uniformly at random.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */

 *       does it offer a way to batch multiple events from a single producer together.
 *   <li>It doesn't support backpressure and other features needed for resilience.
 *   <li>It doesn't provide much control of threading.
 *   <li>It doesn't offer much monitoring.
 *   <li>It doesn't propagate exceptions, so apps don't have a way to react to them.
 *   <li>It doesn't interoperate well with RxJava, coroutines, and other more commonly used

Many packages that simplify it a lot have to make many compromises with the data model, database, and available features. And some of these packages that simplify things too much actually have security flaws underneath.

---

**FastAPI** doesn't make any compromise with any database, data model or tool.

It gives you all the flexibility to choose the ones that fit your project the best.

   * map of public suffixes. The encoded trie string may be broken into multiple chunks to avoid the
   * 64k limit on string literal size. In-memory strings can be much larger (2G).
   */
  static ImmutableMap<String, PublicSuffixType> parseTrie(CharSequence... encodedChunks) {
    String encoded = DIRECT_JOINER.join(encodedChunks);
    return parseFullString(encoded);
  }

import java.util.Map.Entry;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Base class for map testers.
 *
 * <p>TODO: see how much of this is actually needed once Map testers are written. (It was cloned
 * from AbstractCollectionTester.)
 *
 * @param <K> the key type of the map to be tested.
 * @param <V> the value type of the map to be tested.

</dependencies>
    ]]></configuration>
    <description>
      <![CDATA[
      This is a set of Artifact instances resolved from the set of dependencies for
      the current project.

      NOTE: This will likely contain much more than the direct dependencies of the
      current POM, since Maven uses transitive, or chained, dependency resolution.
    ]]></description>
  </expression>
  <expression>
    <syntax>project.parentArtifact</syntax>

   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should
   * be included, and it's much easier to implement the interpretation that they not be. Finally, a
   * call to {@code shutdown} or {@code shutdownNow} may result in concurrent calls to {@code