artifact.addMetadata(new SnapshotArtifactRepositoryMetadata(artifact, snapshot));
        }

        Versioning versioning = new Versioning();
        // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
        versioning.updateTimestamp();
        versioning.addVersion(artifact.getBaseVersion());
        if (artifact.isRelease()) {
            versioning.setRelease(artifact.getBaseVersion());
        }

        artifact.addMetadata(metadata);
    }

    private ArtifactMetadata createMetadata(Artifact artifact) {
        Versioning versioning = new Versioning();
        // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
        versioning.updateTimestamp();
        versioning.addVersion(artifact.getVersion());

        if (artifact.isRelease()) {
            versioning.setRelease(artifact.getVersion());
        }

    /**
     * Determines whether specified activation method is present in configuration or not. It should help to have AND
     * between activation conditions
     * Need for solving https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-4565
     * @param profile The profile whose activation status should be determined, must not be {@code null}.
     * @param context The environmental context used to determine the activation status of the profile, must not be

            <parent>parent</parent>
          </overrides>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>
    </plugins>
  </build>

  <reporting>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>MNG-5115</artifactId>
        <reportSets>
          <reportSet>
            <id>default-inherited</id>
            <reports>
              <report>to-be-inherited</report>
            </reports>
          </reportSet>

                    && versionRangeResult.getVersionConstraint().getRange().getUpperBound() == null) {
                // Message below is checked for in the MNG-2199 core IT.
                throw new UnresolvableModelException(
                        String.format(
                                "The requested parent version range '%s' does not specify an upper bound",

                            project.setArtifactId(relocation.getArtifactId());
                        }
                        if (relocation.getVersion() != null) {
                            // note: see MNG-3454. This causes a problem, but fixing it may break more.
                            artifact.setVersionRange(VersionRange.createFromVersion(relocation.getVersion()));
                            relocatedArtifact = artifact;

                    if (present != null && !equals(dependency, present) && !directDependencies.contains(key)) {
                        // TODO: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8004
                        problems.add(new ModelProblemCollectorRequest(
                                        ModelProblem.Severity.WARNING, ModelProblem.Version.V40)

                            for (int j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
                                Artifact resetArtifact = resetNodes[j].getArtifact();

                                // MNG-2123: if the previous node was not a range, then it wouldn't have any available
                                // versions. We just clobbered the selected version above. (why? I have no idea.)

        VersionRange versionRange;
        try {
            versionRange = VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec(d.getVersion());
        } catch (InvalidVersionSpecificationException e) {
            // MNG-5368: Log a message instead of returning 'null' silently.
            this.logger.error(
                    String.format(

        cli.properties(maybeColorRequest);
        assertThrows(
                IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> cli.logging(maybeColorRequest), "maybe is not a valid option");
    }

    /**
     * Verifies MNG-6558
     */
    @Test
    void testToolchainsBuildingEvents() throws Exception {
        final EventSpyDispatcher eventSpyDispatcherMock = mock(EventSpyDispatcher.class);