Since the naming of the properties no longer suggests they are experimental, we want to ensure users are aware if the current property stops having an effect.
Since the underlying feature is incubating, its actual behavior can still change or be removed in the minor releases.

These properties CAN be supplemented with command-line options and they SHOULD follow the shared naming scheme described above.

in handling your report.

Please, provide a detailed explanation of the issue. In particular, outline the type of the security
issue (DoS, authentication bypass, information disclose, ...) and the assumptions you're making (e.g. do
you need access credentials for a successful exploit).

If you have not received a reply to your email within 48 hours or you have not heard from the security team

 * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test:
 * each model in the lineage is providing a value that is not present
 * anywhere else in the lineage. We are just making sure that values
 * down in the lineage are bubbling up where they should.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {

@GwtCompatible
final class NaturalOrdering extends Ordering<Comparable<?>> implements Serializable {
  static final NaturalOrdering INSTANCE = new NaturalOrdering();

  /*
   * TODO: b/287198172 - Consider eagerly initializing these, maybe making them static. But that
   * would lead to at least slighly more work at startup time.
   */
  @LazyInit private transient @Nullable Ordering<@Nullable Comparable<?>> nullsFirst;

   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *
   * We'd just use PackageSanityTests directly, saving us from needing this separate type, but we're
   * currently skipping MediumTests on Android, and we skip them by not making them present at
   * runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on

          Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or
          authority to forbid You from making technical modifications
          necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including
          technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective
          Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License,
          simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a)
          (4) never produces Adapted Material.

        Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator1 = multiset1.entrySet().iterator();
        Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator2 = multiset2.entrySet().iterator();
        // TODO(lowasser): consider making the entries live views
        return new AbstractIterator<Entry<E>>() {
          @Override
          protected @Nullable Entry<E> computeNext() {
            if (iterator1.hasNext()) {

        Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator1 = multiset1.entrySet().iterator();
        Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator2 = multiset2.entrySet().iterator();
        // TODO(lowasser): consider making the entries live views
        return new AbstractIterator<Entry<E>>() {
          @Override
          protected @Nullable Entry<E> computeNext() {
            if (iterator1.hasNext()) {

  @Override
  public int indexOf(@Nullable Object target) {
    int index = delegateCollection().indexOf(target);

    // TODO(kevinb): reconsider if it's really worth making feeble attempts at
    // sanity for inconsistent comparators.

    // The equals() check is needed when the comparator isn't compatible with
    // equals().
    return (index >= 0 && get(index).equals(target)) ? index : -1;

  + Make sure you fill in the earliest version that you know has the issue.
+ Fork the repository on GitHub.

Making and Submitting Changes
--------------

We accept Pull Requests via GitHub. The [developer mailing list][dev-ml-list] is the
main channel of communication for contributors.  
There are some guidelines which will make applying PRs easier for us: