List<? extends E> list,
          int foundIndex) {
        // Of course, we have to use binary search to find the precise
        // breakpoint...
        int lower = 0;
        int upper = foundIndex;
        // Of course, we have to use binary search to find the precise breakpoint...
        // Everything between lower and upper inclusive compares at <= 0.
        while (lower < upper) {

//  3. Inconsistent validation.  Because the usages are different, the validation rules are different by usage, which makes it hard for users to predict what will happen.
//  4. The fields are both imprecise and overly precise.  Kind is not a precise mapping to a URL. This can produce ambiguity
//     during interpretation and require a REST mapping.  In most cases, the dependency is on the group,resource tuple

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image04.png">
</div>

With this feature from **Pydantic v2**, your API documentation is more **precise**, and if you have autogenerated clients and SDKs, they will be more precise too, with a better **developer experience** and consistency. 🎉

## Do not Separate Schemas

// Copyright 2013 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

package errors

// Testing precise operand formatting in error messages
// (matching messages are regular expressions, hence the \'s).
func f(x int, m map[string]int) {
	// no values
	_ = f /* ERROR "f(0, m) (no value) used as value" */ (0, m)

	// built-ins

// services are explicitly passed here to account for the heuristics
func getLoggingCmd(n *nodeLogQuery, services []string) (string, []string, error) {
	args := []string{
		"--utc",
		"--no-pager",
		"--output=short-precise",
	}
	if n.SinceTime != nil {
		args = append(args, fmt.Sprintf("--since=%s", n.SinceTime.Format(dateLayout)))
	}
	if n.UntilTime != nil {
		args = append(args, fmt.Sprintf("--until=%s", n.UntilTime.Format(dateLayout)))

    public final Path buildPath; // path of the owning build

    /**
     * Tasks can be replaced in Gradle, meaning there can be two different tasks with the same path/type.
     * This allows identifying a precise instance.
     */
    public final long uniqueId;

    TaskIdentity(Class<T> type, String name, Path projectPath, Path identityPath, Path buildPath, long uniqueId) {
        this.name = name;

 * while the newEntry() method is expected to be called by “producer” threads.
 * <p>
 * The collections returned by the consumer methods do not return live collections so may not reflect the precise state of the registry
 * by the time they are returned to the caller. Clients must therefore be prepared for this and expect connection failures, either through

  //
  // If false, a caller might implement pretty-printing by resolving and
  // iterating over the resulting tensor. This may still be viable if resolving
  // the handle loses information, but `SummarizeValue` would be more precise.
  virtual bool PreferCustomSummarizer() const { return false; }

  // Returns a string which summarizes the value of this TensorHandle, for
  // debugging. Does not include a shape or dtype.
  //

	T, _ := t.Underlying().(*types.Interface)
	if V == nil || T == nil {
		return nil
	}

	// Mitigations for interface comparisons and generics.
	// TODO(https://github.com/golang/go/issues/50658): Support more precise conclusion.
	if free.Has(V) || free.Has(T) {
		return nil
	}
	if f, wrongType := types.MissingMethod(V, T, false); wrongType {
		return f
	}
	return nil
}

            assert positionLocation != null: "Expected a precise file location, but it was null"
            // Register that we've asserted this location
            assertedLocationCount += 1

            def offsetLocation = locations.find {
                it instanceof OffsetInFileLocation
            }
            assert offsetLocation != null: "Expected a precise file location, but it was null"