### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

    }

    /**
     * Reads up to len bytes of data from this input stream into an array of bytes.
     * Optimized for better performance with larger read sizes and reduced round trips.
     *
     * @param b the buffer to read into
     * @param off the offset in the buffer to start writing
     * @param len the maximum number of bytes to read
     * @return number of bytes read
     *
     * @throws IOException

        assertEquals(blob.get().hashCode(), blob.hashCode(), "hashCode should delegate to internal array");
    }

    // Confirms constructor handles null by producing an empty buffer
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constructor with null sets empty buffer")
    void constructor_withNull_setsEmpty() {
        // Arrange & Act
        SecurityBlob blob = new SecurityBlob(null);

        // Assert

        encodeSockaddr(buffer, 20);
        
        return buffer;
    }
    
    private void encodeSockaddr(byte[] buffer, int offset) {
        if (ipv6) {
            // IPv6 sockaddr_in6 structure
            writeInt2(buffer, offset, 23);  // AF_INET6
            writeInt2(buffer, offset + 2, 445);  // Port
            writeInt4(buffer, offset + 4, 0);  // Flow info

            SMBUtil.writeTime(creationTimeMs, buffer, 8);
            SMBUtil.writeTime(lastAccessTimeMs, buffer, 16);
            SMBUtil.writeTime(lastWriteTimeMs, buffer, 24);
            SMBUtil.writeTime(creationTimeMs + 300, buffer, 32);
            SMBUtil.writeInt8(4096, buffer, 40);
            SMBUtil.writeInt8(2048, buffer, 48);
            SMBUtil.writeInt4(0x20, buffer, 56);

            // When

* Stellen Sie eine **Frage** oder bitten Sie um Hilfe mit einem **Problem**.
* Schlagen Sie eine neue **Funktionalität** vor.

**Hinweis**: Wenn Sie das tun, bitte ich Sie, auch anderen zu helfen. 😉

## Pull Requests prüfen

Sie können mir helfen, Pull Requests von anderen zu überprüfen (Review).

Noch einmal, bitte versuchen Sie Ihr Bestes, freundlich zu sein. 🤗

---

            buffer[errorStart + 2] = 1; // error context count
            SMBUtil.writeInt4(5, buffer, errorStart + 4); // byte count

            // Error data
            buffer[errorStart + 8] = 1;
            buffer[errorStart + 9] = 2;
            buffer[errorStart + 10] = 3;
            buffer[errorStart + 11] = 4;
            buffer[errorStart + 12] = 5;

            return buffer;
        }

  std::atomic<bool> extend_before_run;
};

struct TF_ImportGraphDefOptions {
  tensorflow::ImportGraphDefOptions opts;

  // Backing memory for TensorId fields in opts.
  // TODO(skyewm): it'd be better if ImportGraphDefOptions owned this.
  std::vector<tensorflow::string> tensor_id_data;
};

struct TF_ImportGraphDefResults {
  std::vector<TF_Output> return_tensors;
  std::vector<TF_Operation*> return_nodes;

 * These status codes are returned by SMB servers to indicate the result
 * of requested operations. The codes follow the Windows NT status code format.
 */
public interface NtStatus {

    /*
     * Don't bother to edit this. Everything within the interface
     * block is automatically generated from the ntstatus package.
     */

    /** The operation completed successfully */
    int NT_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0x00000000;

            int bytesWritten = context.encode(buffer, 0);

            assertEquals(12, bytesWritten);
            assertEquals(3, SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 0));
            assertEquals(2, SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 2));
            assertEquals(0x01, SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 4));
            assertEquals(0x02, SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 6));
            assertEquals(0x03, SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 8));