Zum Beispiel, wenn der Client versucht, einen `tool`-Header mit einem Wert von `plumbus` zu senden, erhält er eine **Error-Response**, die ihm mitteilt, dass der Header-Parameter `tool` nicht erlaubt ist:

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["header", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus",

For example, if the client tries to send a `tool` header with a value of `plumbus`, they will receive an **error** response telling them that the header parameter `tool` is not allowed:

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["header", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus",

如果客戶端嘗試在**查詢參數**中發送一些**額外的**資料，他們將會收到一個**錯誤**回應。

例如，如果客戶端嘗試發送一個值為 `plumbus` 的 `tool` 查詢參數，如：

```http
https://example.com/items/?limit=10&tool=plumbus
```

他們將收到一個**錯誤**回應，告訴他們查詢參數 `tool` 是不允許的：

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["query", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus"
        }

    public static final String MVNENC_NAME = "Maven Password Encrypting Tool";

    public static final String MVNSHELL_CMD = "mvnsh";
    public static final String MVNSHELL_NAME = "Maven Shell Tool";

    public static final String MVNUP_CMD = "mvnup";
    public static final String MVNUP_NAME = "Maven Upgrade Tool";

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */

/**
 * Maven Upgrade Tool Goals and Strategies.
 *
 * <p>This package contains the implementation of the Maven upgrade tool (mvnup) that helps
 * upgrade Maven projects to be compatible with Maven 4. The tool is organized around
 * a goal-based architecture with pluggable upgrade strategies.</p>
 *
 * <h2>Architecture Overview</h2>
 *

* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

The *Build Tool Team* has decided to use Architectural Decision Records (aka ADR) to track decisions we want to follow.

# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
# license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

eval `{go tool dist env -9}

if(! test -x $GOTOOLDIR/dist){
	echo 'cannot find $GOTOOLDIR/dist; nothing to clean' >[1=2]
	exit noclean
}

$GOBIN/go clean -i std
$GOBIN/go tool dist clean

Наприклад, якщо клієнт спробує надіслати заголовок `tool` зі значенням `plumbus`, він отримає  **помилку** з повідомленням про те, що параметр заголовка `tool` не дозволений:

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["header", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus",
        }

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server
    * **Starlette**: (uses Uvicorn) a web microframework

Например, если клиент попытается отправить заголовок `tool` со значением `plumbus`, то в ответ он получит ошибку, сообщающую ему, что header-параметр `tool` не разрешен:

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {
            "type": "extra_forbidden",
            "loc": ["header", "tool"],
            "msg": "Extra inputs are not permitted",
            "input": "plumbus",
        }
    ]