import junit.framework.TestCase;

/** Unit tests for {@link LongAdder}. */
public class LongAdderTest extends TestCase {

  /**
   * No-op null-pointer test for {@link LongAdder} to override the {@link PackageSanityTests}
   * version, which checks package-private methods that we don't want to have to annotate as {@code
   * Nullable} because we don't want diffs from jsr166e.
   */
  public void testNulls() {}

     * allowed. But at the same time, it seems wasteful to bother inserting the checkNotNull calls
     * that NullPointerTester wants.
     *
     * (This empty method disables the automatic null testing provided by PackageSanityTests.)
     */
  }

 * extends {@code AbstractPackageSanityTests}. Currently sanity checks include {@link
 * NullPointerTester}, {@link EqualsTester} and {@link SerializableTester}. For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {}
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Note that only top-level classes with either a non-private constructor or a non-private static

     * That combination upsets NullPointerTester, which wants any call that passes null for a
     * non-@Nullable parameter to trigger a NullPointerException.
     *
     * (We still define this empty method to keep PackageSanityTests from generating its own
     * automated nullness tests, which would fail.)
     */
  }

  private static final Object IGNORE_ME =
      new Object() {
        @Override

            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*PackageSanityTests.*.class]</exclude>

            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*PackageSanityTests.*.class]</exclude>

 * extends {@code AbstractPackageSanityTests}. Currently sanity checks include {@link
 * NullPointerTester}, {@link EqualsTester} and {@link SerializableTester}. For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {}
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Note that only top-level classes with either a non-private constructor or a non-private static