issues with Docker 1.9.1 can be found below.
  * CPU hardcapping will be enabled by default for containers with CPU limit set,
if supported by the kernel. You should either adjust your CPU limit, or set CPU
request only, if you want to avoid hardcapping. If the kernel does not support
CPU Quota, NodeStatus will contain a warning indicating that CPU Limits cannot
be enforced.

	retry:
	  attempts: 10 # number of retries for the job before giving up
	  delay: "500ms" # least amount of delay between each retry
```

You can create and run multiple 'replication' jobs at a time there are no predefined limits set.

## Batch Jobs Terminology

### Job

 * handles timeout scenarios, and ensures proper cleanup of resources.</p>
 *
 * <p>Key features:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Concurrent crawler process management with configurable limits</li>
 *   <li>Selective crawling based on configuration IDs</li>
 *   <li>Document expiration handling</li>
 *   <li>Hot thread monitoring for performance analysis</li>
 *   <li>Process isolation with separate JVM</li>

 * This callback processes file events (create, modify, delete) and manages document indexing and deletion
 * operations in the search engine. It supports recursive crawling with configurable depth and access count limits.
 *
 * <p>The implementation uses an executor service for concurrent processing of file operations and maintains
 * a cache of URLs to be deleted for batch processing. It handles redirect following and child URL discovery

         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

        validClasses.add(new WeakReference<Class<? extends Exception>>(exceptionClass));
      }
    }

    this.replacements = escaperMap.getReplacementArray();
    this.replacementsLength = replacements.length;
    if (safeMax < safeMin) {
      // If the safe range is empty, set the range limits to opposite extremes
      // to ensure the first test of either value will fail.
      safeMax = -1;
      safeMin = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
    }
    this.safeMin = safeMin;
    this.safeMax = safeMax;

   * integer overflow. This will not return null for labels that fit within the DNS size
   * limits.
   */
  fun encode(string: String): String? {
    var pos = 0
    val limit = string.length
    val result = Buffer()

    while (pos < limit) {
      var dot = string.indexOf('.', startIndex = pos)
      if (dot == -1) dot = limit

      if (!encodeLabel(string, pos, dot, result)) {

        }

        // Reasonable upper limit (1TB)
        long maxSize = 1099511627776L;
        if (size > maxSize) {
            failedValidations.incrementAndGet();
            log.warn("File size exceeds reasonable limit: {} > {}", size, maxSize);
            throw new SmbException("File size exceeds limit: " + size);
        }
    }

    /**

### There are no limits on how many server pools can be combined

```
minio server http://host{1...32}/export{1...32} http://host{1...12}/export{1...12}
```

In above example there are two server pools

  - Added validation to enforce the hugepage aggregated container limits to be smaller than or equal to pod-level limits. This was already enforced with the defaulted requests from the specified limits, however it did not make it clear about both hugepage requests and limits. ([#131089](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/131089), [@KevinTMtz](https://github.com/KevinTMtz)) [SIG Apps, Node and Testing]