}
      // re-read valueField, if we get here then we must have observed a TOMBSTONE while trying to
      // add a waiter.
      // requireNonNull is safe because valueField is always set before TOMBSTONE.
      return getDoneValue(requireNonNull(valueField));
    }
    // If we get here then we have remainingNanos < SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS and there is no node on the
    // waiters list

import com.google.common.primitives.Doubles;

/**
 * A mutable object which accumulates paired double values (e.g. points on a plane) and tracks some
 * basic statistics over all the values added so far. This class is not thread safe.
 *
 * @author Pete Gillin
 * @since 20.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public final class PairedStatsAccumulator {
  /** Creates a new accumulator. */
  public PairedStatsAccumulator() {}

# Extra Models { #extra-models }

Continuing with the previous example, it will be common to have more than one related model.

This is especially the case for user models, because:

* The **input model** needs to be able to have a password.
* The **output model** should not have a password.
* The **database model** would probably need to have a hashed password.

/// danger

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

## Import `Form` { #import-form }

Import `Form` from `fastapi`:

{* ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001_an_py39.py hl[3] *}

## Define `Form` parameters { #define-form-parameters }

Create form parameters the same way you would for `Body` or `Query`:

{* ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001_an_py39.py hl[9] *}

        String ip = "192.168.1.3";

        // Make attempts from same IP with different users
        for (int i = 1; i <= 5; i++) {
            assertTrue(rateLimiter.checkAttempt("user" + i, ip), "Attempt " + i + " should be allowed");
            rateLimiter.recordFailure("user" + i, ip);
        }

        // 6th attempt from same IP should be blocked

=====================

OkHttp 4.x upgrades our implementation language from Java to Kotlin and keeps everything else the
same. We’ve chosen Kotlin because it gives us powerful new capabilities while integrating closely
with Java.

We spent a lot of time and energy on retaining strict compatibility with OkHttp 3.x. We’re even
keeping the package name the same: `okhttp3`!

There are three kinds of compatibility we’re tracking: