* and its subclass in different packages, causing the serialization system to fail to invoke {@code
 * writeReplace} when serializing an instance of the subclass. For an example of this problem, see
 * b/310253115.
 */
public class WriteReplaceOverridesTest extends TestCase {
  private static final ImmutableSet<String> GUAVA_PACKAGES =
      FluentIterable.of(
              "base",
              "cache",

            throws ArtifactResolutionException, ArtifactNotFoundException {
        ArtifactResolutionResult result = resolve(request);

        // We have collected all the problems so let's mimic the way the old code worked and just blow up right here.
        // That's right lets just let it rip right here and send a big incomprehensible blob of text at unsuspecting
        // users. Bad dog!

                    server = result.getServer();

                    if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                        for (SettingsProblem problem : result.getProblems()) {
                            logger.debug(problem.getMessage(), problem.getException());
                        }
                    }

            }

            return pb.start().waitFor();
        } catch (IOException e) {
            invokerRequest.logger().error("IO problem while executing command: " + cmdAndArguments, e);
            return 127;
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            invokerRequest.logger().error("Interrupted while executing command: " + cmdAndArguments, e);

# Extending OpenAPI

There are some cases where you might need to modify the generated OpenAPI schema.

In this section you will see how.

## The normal process

The normal (default) process, is as follows.

A `FastAPI` application (instance) has an `.openapi()` method that is expected to return the OpenAPI schema.

                        <id>compile</id>
                        <phase>process-sources</phase>
                        <goals>
                            <goal>compile</goal>
                        </goals>
                    </execution>
                    <execution>
                        <id>test-compile</id>
                        <phase>process-test-sources</phase>
                        <goals>

import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.processor.ResponseProcessor;

/**
 * @author kuma
 *
 */
public class NullResponseProcessor implements ResponseProcessor {

    @Override
    public void process(final ResponseData responseData) {
        // do nothing
    }

### TODO

In subsequent releases we are planning to extend this to provide things like

- Reload() of MinIO server arguments without fully restarting the process.

- Expanding 1 node at a time by automating the process of creating a new pool
  and decommissioning to provide a functionality that smaller deployments
  care about.

   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.

   * reading, such as an {@code InputStream}. Unlike with writable resources, there's no chance that
   * a failure that occurs when closing the stream indicates a meaningful problem such as a failure
   * to flush all bytes to the underlying resource.
   *
   * @param inputStream the input stream to be closed, or {@code null} in which case this method
   *     does nothing
   * @since 17.0
   */