strconv.FormatInt(bytesReturned, 10) + `</BytesReturned></Stats>`)
	return genMessage(statsHeader, payload)
}

// endMessage - indicates that the request is complete, and no more messages will be sent.
// You should not assume that the request is complete until the client receives an End message.
//
// Header specification:
// End messages contain two headers, as follows:

    response = client.post("/with-computed-field/", json={"name": "example"})
    response2 = client_no.post("/with-computed-field/", json={"name": "example"})
    assert response.status_code == response2.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert (
        response.json()
        == response2.json()
        == {
            "name": "example",
            "computed_field": "computed example",
        }
    )

        Guava's main yardstick for evaluating proposed features can be summed up as [utility times
        ubiquity](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained#utility-times-ubiquity).


        #### Utility: compare with alternatives


        There is always *some* alternative to adding a new feature to Guava, even if it's just
        forking Guava yourself.

    for (double x : VALUES) {
      for (double y : VALUES) {
        // note: spec requires only that the sign is the same
        assertWithMessage("%s, %s", x, y)
            .that(Doubles.compare(x, y))
            .isEqualTo(Double.compare(x, y));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testContains() {
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(EMPTY, 1.0)).isFalse();
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(ARRAY1, 2.0)).isFalse();

abstract class AbstractFutureState<V extends @Nullable Object> extends InternalFutureFailureAccess
    implements ListenableFuture<V> {
  /**
   * Performs a {@linkplain java.lang.invoke.VarHandle#compareAndSet compare-and-set} operation on
   * {@link #listenersField}.
   */
  final boolean casListeners(@Nullable Listener expect, Listener update) {
    return ATOMIC_HELPER.casListeners(this, expect, update);
  }

  /**

        assertTrue(hashCodes.size() > 1);
    }

    /**
     * Test compareTo method
     */
    public void test_compareTo() {
        // Compare with self
        assertEquals(0, CrawlerStatus.INITIALIZING.compareTo(CrawlerStatus.INITIALIZING));
        assertEquals(0, CrawlerStatus.RUNNING.compareTo(CrawlerStatus.RUNNING));

    // let the computation proceed
    computingLatch.countDown();
    // don't check cache.size() until we know the get("b") call is complete
    computationComplete.await();

    // At this point, the listener should be holding the seed value (a -> a), and the map should
    // contain the computed value (b -> b), since the clear() happened before the computation
    // completed.
    assertThat(listener).hasSize(1);

        list.add(closeable, closingExecutor);
      }
      return closeable;
    }
  }

  /**
   * An operation that computes a result.
   *
   * @param <V> the type of the result
   */
  public interface ClosingCallable<V extends @Nullable Object> {
    /**
     * Computes a result, or throws an exception if unable to do so.
     *

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

But in our code we are actually using `secrets.compare_digest()`.

In short, it will take the same time to compare `stanleyjobsox` to `stanleyjobson` than it takes to compare `johndoe` to `stanleyjobson`. And the same for the password.

                Arguments.of(WinError.ERROR_REQ_NOT_ACCEP,
                        "No more connections can be made to this remote computer at this time because there are already as many connections as the computer can accept."),
                Arguments.of(WinError.ERROR_BAD_PIPE, "The pipe state is invalid."),
                Arguments.of(WinError.ERROR_PIPE_BUSY, "All pipe instances are busy."),