stopwatch.start();
    ticker.advance(999999);
    assertEquals(0, stopwatch.elapsed(MILLISECONDS));
    ticker.advance(1);
    assertEquals(1, stopwatch.elapsed(MILLISECONDS));
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // TODO(b/259213718): Switch J2kt to String.format("%.4g") once that's supported
  public void testToString() {
    stopwatch.start();
    assertEquals("0.000 ns", stopwatch.toString());
    ticker.advance(1);

    if (singleByte) {
      for (int i = off; i < off + len; i++) {
        out.write(b[i]);
      }
    } else {
      out.write(b, off, len);
    }
    out.flush(); // for coverage
  }

  // TODO(chrisn): only works if we ensure we have crossed file threshold

  public void testWriteErrorAfterClose() throws Exception {
    byte[] data = newPreFilledByteArray(100);

    this.equivalence = checkNotNull(equivalence);
    this.relationshipName = checkNotNull(relationshipName);
    this.hashName = checkNotNull(hashName);
    this.itemReporter = checkNotNull(itemReporter);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): should we reject null items, since the tests already check null automatically?
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public RelationshipTester<T> addRelatedGroup(Iterable<? extends T> group) {

Esto funciona de la misma manera que con los modelos de Pydantic. Y en realidad se logra de la misma manera internamente, utilizando Pydantic.

/// info | Información

Ten en cuenta que los dataclasses no pueden hacer todo lo que los modelos de Pydantic pueden hacer.

Así que, podrías necesitar seguir usando modelos de Pydantic.

        if (crawlingInfoPager.id != null) {
            cb.query().docMeta().setId_Equal(crawlingInfoPager.id);
        }
        // TODO Long, Integer, String supported only.
        if (StringUtil.isNotBlank(crawlingInfoPager.sessionId)) {
            cb.query().setSessionId_Match(crawlingInfoPager.sessionId);
        }

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  private static final Joiner JOINER = Joiner.on(", ");

  @Override
  protected final void assertMoreInvariants(Map<K, V> map) {
    // TODO: can these be moved to MapInterfaceTest?
    for (Entry<K, V> entry : map.entrySet()) {
      assertEquals(entry.getKey() + "=" + entry.getValue(), entry.toString());
    }

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class CollectionEqualsTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "SelfEquals", // TODO(cpovirk): Consider using EqualsTester from Guava.
    "UndefinedEquals", // Comparisons of an object to itself *are* defined.
  })
  public void testEquals_self() {

            ArtifactVersion version2 = node2.getArtifact().getSelectedVersion();

            return version1.compareTo(version2) <= 0 ? node1 : node2;
        } catch (OverConstrainedVersionException exception) {
            // TODO log message or throw exception?

            return null;
        }
    }

  /**
   * Returns the value associated with {@code key} in this cache, or {@code null} if there is no
   * cached value for {@code key}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // TODO(b/27479612): consider removing this?
  @Nullable V getIfPresent(@CompatibleWith("K") Object key);

  /**
   * Returns the value associated with {@code key} in this cache, obtaining that value from {@code

   * <i>only</i> if the caller knows that the collection does not contain any null elements.
   *
   * <p>This method returns the elements in the order they are returned by the collection's
   * iterator.
   *
   * <p>TODO(kevinb): support concurrently modified collections?
   *
   * @param c the collection for which to return an array of elements
   * @param array the array in which to place the collection elements