public class LsaPolicyHandle extends rpc.policy_handle {

    DcerpcHandle handle;

    /**
     * Constructs an LSA policy handle.
     *
     * @param handle the DCERPC handle
     * @param server the server name
     * @param access the access rights
     * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs
     */
    public LsaPolicyHandle(final DcerpcHandle handle, String server, final int access) throws IOException {

 */
public class MsrpcDfsRootEnum extends netdfs.NetrDfsEnumEx {

    /**
     * Creates a new DFS root enumeration request for the specified server.
     *
     * @param server the server name to enumerate DFS roots from
     */
    public MsrpcDfsRootEnum(final String server) {
        super(server, 200, 0xFFFF, new netdfs.DfsEnumStruct(), new NdrLong(0));
        info.level = level;

     * the filename of the source file.
     *
     * @param basedir the directory where the artifact is stored
     * @param finalName the name of the artifact sans extension
     * @param artifact the artifact definition
     * @param localRepository the local repository to install into
     * @throws ArtifactInstallationException if an error occurred installing the artifact

        this.taskName = taskName;
    }

    @Input
    public String getTaskName() {
        return taskName;
    }

    @Option(option = "tests", description = "Sets test class or method name to be included, '*' is supported.")
    public void setTestClass(String testClass) {
        this.testClass = testClass;
    }

    @Input
    public List<String> getExtraArgs() {
        return extraArgs;
    }

 * So instead of binding the component under a 'wildcard' key it is now bound with an explicit
 * key. Since this is a default component, this will be a plain binding of ModelProcessor to
 * this implementation type; that is no hint/name.
 *
 * This leads to a second side effect in that any @Inject request for just ModelProcessor in
 * the same injector is immediately matched to this explicit binding, which means extensions

	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	for _, de := range dirents {
		switch de.Name() {
		case "bin", "pkg":
			// We already created GOROOT/bin and GOROOT/pkg above; skip those.
			continue
		}
		if err := adb("push", filepath.Join(goroot, de.Name()), path.Join(deviceGoroot, de.Name())); err != nil {
			return err
		}
	}

	if _, err := stat.WriteString(goVersion); err != nil {

        String orgName = "MyCo";

        Model model = new Model(org.apache.maven.api.model.Model.newBuilder()
                .name("${project.organization.name} Tools")
                .organization(org.apache.maven.api.model.Organization.newBuilder()
                        .name(orgName)
                        .build())
                .build());

        ModelInterpolator interpolator = createInterpolator();

        } catch (final IOException e) {
            throw new DictionaryException("Failed to parse " + path, e);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Returns the simple file name (without directory path) of this mapping file.
     *
     * @return the file name without the full path
     */
    public String getSimpleName() {
        return new File(path).getName();
    }

    /**

            }

            @Override
            public String[] getExtraQueries() {
                return extraQueries;
            }

            @Override
            public Object getAttribute(String name) {
                return null;
            }

            @Override
            public Locale getLocale() {
                return null;
            }

            @Override

OAuth2 specifies that when using the "password flow" (that we are using) the client/user must send a `username` and `password` fields as form data.

And the spec says that the fields have to be named like that. So `user-name` or `email` wouldn't work.

But don't worry, you can show it as you wish to your final users in the frontend.

And your database models can use any other names you want.