* The table size is capped because, when there are more threads
   * than CPUs, supposing that each thread were bound to a CPU,
   * there would exist a perfect hash function mapping threads to
   * slots that eliminates collisions. When we reach capacity, we
   * search for this mapping by randomly varying the hash codes of
   * colliding threads.  Because search is random, and collisions
   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,

     * This replaces pre-/post- phases with before:/after: phases.
     */
    private void upgradeDeprecatedPhases(Editor editor, UpgradeContext context) {
        // Create mapping of deprecated phases to their Maven 4 equivalents
        Map<String, String> phaseUpgrades = createPhaseUpgradeMap();

        Element root = editor.root();
        if (root == null) {
            return;
        }

    builder.setSafeRange('a', 'z');
    builder.setUnsafeReplacement("X");
    builder.addEscape(' ', "_");
    Escaper first = builder.build();
    // Modify one of the existing mappings before creating a new escaper.
    builder.addEscape(' ', "-");
    builder.addEscape('!', "$");
    Escaper second = builder.build();
    // This should have no effect on existing escapers.
    builder.addEscape(' ', "*");

                        </ol>
                    </div>
                </div>
            </div>
        </div>
        <section class="content">
            <la:form action="/admin/dict/mapping/">
                <la:hidden property="crudMode"/>
                <la:hidden property="dictId"/>
                <c:if test="${crudMode==2 || crudMode==3 || crudMode==4}">
                    <la:hidden property="id"/>

  @CollectionSize.Require(ZERO)
  public void testPutPresentKeyDifferentValue() {
    getMap().put(k0(), v0());
    getMap().put(k0(), v1());
    // verify that the bimap is changed, and that the old inverse mapping
    // from v1 -> v0 is deleted
    expectContents(mapEntry(k0(), v1()));
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_PUT)
  @CollectionSize.Require(ZERO)
  public void putDistinctKeysDistinctValues() {

    extends AbstractMapBasedMultimap<K, V> implements ListMultimap<K, V> {
  /**
   * Creates a new multimap that uses the provided map.
   *
   * @param map place to store the mapping from each key to its corresponding values
   */
  protected AbstractListMultimap(Map<K, Collection<V>> map) {
    super(map);
  }

  @Override
  abstract List<V> createCollection();

    extends SetMultimap<K, V> {
  // Following Javadoc copied from Multimap.

  /**
   * Returns a collection view of all values associated with a key. If no mappings in the multimap
   * have the provided key, an empty collection is returned.
   *
   * <p>Changes to the returned collection will update the underlying multimap, and vice versa.
   *

    extends AbstractMapBasedMultimap<K, V> implements SetMultimap<K, V> {
  /**
   * Creates a new multimap that uses the provided map.
   *
   * @param map place to store the mapping from each key to its corresponding values
   */
  protected AbstractSetMultimap(Map<K, Collection<V>> map) {
    super(map);
  }

  @Override
  abstract Set<V> createCollection();

  @Override

    extends AbstractMapBasedMultimap<K, V> implements SetMultimap<K, V> {
  /**
   * Creates a new multimap that uses the provided map.
   *
   * @param map place to store the mapping from each key to its corresponding values
   */
  protected AbstractSetMultimap(Map<K, Collection<V>> map) {
    super(map);
  }

  @Override
  abstract Set<V> createCollection();

  @Override

  /**
   * An alternate form of {@code put} that silently removes any existing entry with the value {@code
   * value} before proceeding with the {@link #put} operation. If the bimap previously contained the
   * provided key-value mapping, this method has no effect.
   *
   * <p>Note that a successful call to this method could cause the size of the bimap to increase by
   * one, stay the same, or even decrease by one.
   *