Isso foi modificado na versão 0.110.0 para consertar o consumo de memória não controlado das exceções relançadas automaticamente sem um manipulador (erros internos do servidor), e para manter o comportamento consistente com o código Python tradicional.

### Tarefas de Background e Dependências com `yield`, Detalhes Técnicos

   * across different segments.
   *
   * The page replacement algorithm's data structures are kept casually consistent with the map. The
   * ordering of writes to a segment is sequentially consistent. An update to the map and recording
   * of reads may not be immediately reflected on the algorithm's data structures. These structures

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(int[], int[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.
   */

  /**
   * Returns an immutable bimap containing the same entries as {@code map}. If {@code map} somehow
   * contains entries with duplicate keys (for example, if it is a {@code SortedMap} whose
   * comparator is not <i>consistent with equals</i>), the results of this method are undefined.
   *
   * <p>The returned {@code BiMap} iterates over entries in the same order as the {@code entrySet}
   * of the original map.
   *

        }
      };
    }

    /**
     * Uses a {@link LinkedList} to store value collections.
     *
     * <p><b>Performance note:</b> {@link ArrayList} and {@link java.util.ArrayDeque} consistently
     * outperform {@code LinkedList} except in certain rare and specific situations. Unless you have
     * spent a lot of time benchmarking your specific needs, use one of those instead. (However, we

        }
      };
    }

    /**
     * Uses a {@link LinkedList} to store value collections.
     *
     * <p><b>Performance note:</b> {@link ArrayList} and {@link java.util.ArrayDeque} consistently
     * outperform {@code LinkedList} except in certain rare and specific situations. Unless you have
     * spent a lot of time benchmarking your specific needs, use one of those instead. (However, we

            }
        };

        SystemHelper systemHelper = new SystemHelper() {
            @Override
            public long getCurrentTimeAsLong() {
                // Return consistent time for testing
                if (expectedTime[0] == 0) {
                    expectedTime[0] = System.currentTimeMillis();
                }
                return expectedTime[0];
            }
        };

            int size = request.size();
            assertEquals(0, size % 8, "Size should be aligned to 8-byte boundary");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have consistent size regardless of parameters")
        void testSizeConsistency() {
            int originalSize = request.size();

            request.setReadLength(65536);
            assertEquals(originalSize, request.size());

            assertTrue(result.contains("sectPerAlloc=8"));
            assertTrue(result.contains("bytesPerSect=512"));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have consistent toString format")
        void shouldHaveConsistentToStringFormat() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // Given
            ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(24);

* Tampoco te preocupes por las reglas de estilo, hay herramientas automatizadas verificando eso.

Y si hay alguna otra necesidad de estilo o consistencia, pediré directamente eso, o agregaré commits encima con los cambios necesarios.

### Revisa el código

* Revisa y lee el código, ve si tiene sentido, **ejecútalo localmente** y ve si realmente resuelve el problema.