## Additional Response with `model` { #additional-response-with-model }

You can pass to your *path operation decorators* a parameter `responses`.

It receives a `dict`: the keys are status codes for each response (like `200`), and the values are other `dict`s with the information for each of them.

Each of those response `dict`s can have a key `model`, containing a Pydantic model, just like `response_model`.

    private final NavigableMap<Cut<C>, Range<C>> rangesByLowerBound;

    /**
     * upperBoundWindow represents the headMap/subMap/tailMap view of the entire "ranges by upper
     * bound" map; it's a constraint on the *keys*, and does not affect the values.
     */
    private final Range<Cut<C>> upperBoundWindow;

    RangesByUpperBound(NavigableMap<Cut<C>, Range<C>> rangesByLowerBound) {
      this.rangesByLowerBound = rangesByLowerBound;

{{- else }} MC="/usr/bin/mc --insecure" {{- end }} # connectToMinio # Use a check-sleep-check loop to wait for Minio service to be available connectToMinio() { SCHEME=$1 ATTEMPTS=0 ; LIMIT=29 ; # Allow 30 attempts set -e ; # fail if we can't read the keys. ACCESS=$(cat /config/rootUser) ; SECRET=$(cat /config/rootPassword) ; set +e ; # The connections to minio are allowed to fail. echo "Connecting to Minio server: $SCHEME://$MINIO_ENDPOINT:$MINIO_PORT" ; MC_COMMAND="${MC} config host add myminio $S...

    assertEquals(values.size() > 0, multimap().containsKey(key));
    assertEquals(values.size() > 0, multimap().keySet().contains(key));
    assertEquals(values.size() > 0, multimap().keys().contains(key));
  }

  protected final K k0() {
    return e0().getKey();
  }

  protected final V v0() {
    return e0().getValue();
  }

  protected final K k1() {

    return Arrays.copyOfRange(source, from, to, (Class<? extends T[]>) arrayOfType.getClass());
  }

  /**
   * Configures the given map maker to use weak keys, if possible; does nothing otherwise (i.e., in
   * GWT). This is sometimes acceptable, when only server-side code could generate enough volume
   * that reclamation becomes important.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible

In this case, **FastAPI** will notice that there is more than one body parameter in the function (there are two parameters that are Pydantic models).

So, it will then use the parameter names as keys (field names) in the body, and expect a body like:

```JSON
{
    "item": {
        "name": "Foo",
        "description": "The pretender",
        "price": 42.0,
        "tax": 3.2
    },
    "user": {

		return nil, errors.New("both the token file and the role ARN are required")
	case conf.AccessKey == "" && conf.SecretKey != "" || conf.AccessKey != "" && conf.SecretKey == "":
		return nil, errors.New("both the access and secret keys are required")
	case conf.AWSRole && (conf.AWSRoleWebIdentityTokenFile != "" || conf.AWSRoleARN != "" || conf.AccessKey != "" || conf.SecretKey != ""):

)

// Multipart objectAPIHandlers

// NewMultipartUploadHandler - New multipart upload.
// Notice: The S3 client can send secret keys in headers for encryption related jobs,
// the handler should ensure to remove these keys before sending them to the object layer.
// Currently these keys are:
//   - X-Amz-Server-Side-Encryption-Customer-Key
//   - X-Amz-Copy-Source-Server-Side-Encryption-Customer-Key

func TestDoesV4PresignParamsExist(t *testing.T) {
	testCases := []struct {
		inputQueryKeyVals []string
		expectedErrCode   APIErrorCode
	}{
		// Test case - 1.
		// contains all query param keys which are necessary for v4 presign request.
		{
			inputQueryKeyVals: []string{
				"X-Amz-Algorithm", "",
				"X-Amz-Credential", "",
				"X-Amz-Signature", "",
				"X-Amz-Date", "",

  public void testPutAllNullValueSingle_unsupported() {
    multimap().putAll(k1(), newArrayList((V) null));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  // In principle, it would be nice to apply these two tests to keys with existing values, too.

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testPutAllNullValueNullLast_unsupported() {
    int size = getNumElements();

    assertThrows(