}

  return SimpleIdnaMappingTable(result)
}

internal data class Mapping(
  val sourceCodePoint0: Int,
  val sourceCodePoint1: Int,
  val type: Int,
  val mappedTo: ByteString,
) {
  val section: Int
    get() = sourceCodePoint0 and 0x1fff80

  val rangeStart: Int
    get() = sourceCodePoint0 and 0x7f

  val hasSingleSourceCodePoint: Boolean
    get() = sourceCodePoint0 == sourceCodePoint1

As part of that, I needed to investigate, test and use many alternatives.

The history of **FastAPI** is in great part the history of its predecessors.

As said in the section [Alternatives](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=_blank}:

<blockquote markdown="1">

**FastAPI** wouldn't exist if not for the previous work of others.

* The frontend stores that token temporarily somewhere.
* The user clicks in the frontend to go to another section of the frontend web app.
* The frontend needs to fetch some more data from the API.
    * But it needs authentication for that specific endpoint.

**FastAPI** applications running under Uvicorn as <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=test&runid=7464e520-0dc2-473d-bd34-dbdfd7e85911&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijzen-7" class="external-link" target="_blank">one of the fastest Python frameworks available</a>, only below Starlette and Uvicorn themselves (used internally by FastAPI). (*)

To understand more about it, see the section <a href="https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/benchmarks/" class="internal-link" target="_blank">Benchmarks</a>....

  integrity sha512-sFFHKwcmBprO9e7Icf0+gddyWYDViL8bpPjJJl0WHxCdETktXdmtWLGVzoHbqUcY4Be1LkNfwTmXOJUFZYSJdA==

"@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section@1.11.6":
  version "1.11.6"
  resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section/-/helper-wasm-section-1.11.6.tgz#ff97f3863c55ee7f580fd5c41a381e9def4aa577"
  integrity sha512-LPpZbSOwTpEC2cgn4hTydySy1Ke+XEu+ETXuoyvuyezHO3Kjdu90KK95Sh9xTbmjrCsUwvWwCOQQNta37VrS9g==

        buf.append(encodeText(text.getData()));
    }

    /**
     * Appends the string representation of a {@link CDATASection}.
     *
     * @param cdataSection
     *            The CDATA section. Must not be {@literal null}.
     * @param buf
     *            The string buffer. Must not be {@literal null}.
     */
    public static void appendCDATASection(final CDATASection cdataSection, final StringBuilder buf) {

                            <la:message key="labels.crawler_title_edit"/>
                        </h1>
                    </div>
                </div>
            </div>
        </div>
        <section class="content">
            <la:form action="/admin/general/">
                <div class="row">
                    <div class="col-md-12">
                        <div class="card card-outline card-success">

 *  * If `server_max_window_bits` is less than 15, OkHttp will waste memory on an oversized buffer.
 *
 * See [RFC 7692, 7.1][rfc_7692] for details on negotiation process.
 *
 * [rfc_7692]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7692#section-7.1
 */
@IgnoreJRERequirement // As of AGP 3.4.1, D8 desugars API 24 hashCode methods.
data class WebSocketExtensions(
  /** True if the agreed upon extensions includes the permessage-deflate extension. */

# 基準測試

由第三方機構 TechEmpower 的基準測試表明在 Uvicorn 下運行的 **FastAPI** 應用程式是 <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=test&runid=7464e520-0dc2-473d-bd34-dbdfd7e85911&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijzen-7" class="external-link" target="_blank">最快的 Python 可用框架之一</a>，僅次於 Starlette 和 Uvicorn 本身（於 FastAPI 內部使用）。

但是在查看基準得分和對比時，請注意以下幾點。

## 基準測試和速度

當你查看基準測試時，時常會見到幾個不同類型的工具被同時進行測試。

具體來說，是將 Uvicorn、Starlette 和 FastAPI 同時進行比較（以及許多其他工具）。

/// info | Примечание

В веб-сокете вызывать `HTTPException` не имеет смысла. Вместо этого нужно использовать `WebSocketException`.

Закрывающий статус код можно использовать из <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455#section-7.4.1" class="external-link" target="_blank">valid codes defined in the specification</a>.

///

### Веб-сокеты с зависимостями: проверка в действии