assertTrue(str.contains("facetResponse="));
    }

    public void test_largeRecordCount() {
        // Test with large record count
        long largeCount = Long.MAX_VALUE;
        SearchResult result = SearchResult.create().allRecordCount(largeCount).build();

        assertEquals(largeCount, result.getAllRecordCount());
    }

    public void test_negativeQueryTime() {

  private static final byte[] ARRAY1 = {(byte) 1};
  private static final byte[] ARRAY234 = {(byte) 2, (byte) 3, (byte) 4};

  private static final byte[] VALUES = {Byte.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Byte.MAX_VALUE};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (byte value : VALUES) {

        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(0, true), Arguments.of(0xFFFF, true), Arguments.of(0x8000, true), Arguments.of(0, false),
                Arguments.of(0xFFFFFFFF, false), Arguments.of(0x80000000, false), Arguments.of(Integer.MAX_VALUE, false),
                Arguments.of(Integer.MIN_VALUE, false));
    }

    // Concrete implementation for testing abstract class
    private static class TestSessionServicePacket extends SessionServicePacket {

   */
  public val requestCount: Int
    get() = atomicRequestCount.get()

  /** The number of bytes of the POST body to keep in memory to the given limit. */
  public var bodyLimit: Long = Long.MAX_VALUE

  public var serverSocketFactory: ServerSocketFactory?
    @Synchronized get() = serverSocketFactory_

    @Synchronized set(value) {

    HashTestUtils.assertInvariants(Hashing.goodFastHash(256));
  }

  public void testConsistentHash_correctness() {
    long[] interestingValues = {-1, 0, 1, 2, Long.MAX_VALUE, Long.MIN_VALUE};
    for (long h : interestingValues) {
      checkConsistentHashCorrectness(h);
    }
    Random r = new Random(7);
    for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {

        // Test execute method with very large boost value
        QueryContext context = new QueryContext("*:*", false);
        MatchAllDocsQuery query = new MatchAllDocsQuery();
        float boost = Float.MAX_VALUE;

        QueryBuilder result = matchAllQueryCommand.execute(context, query, boost);

        assertNotNull(result);
        assertTrue(result instanceof MatchAllQueryBuilder);
    }

    LoadingCache<Object, Object> cache =
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
            .concurrencyLevel(1)
            .maximumWeight(1L << 31)
            .weigher(constantWeigher(Integer.MAX_VALUE))
            .removalListener(removalListener)
            .build(loader);
    cache.getUnchecked(objectWithHash(0));
    cache.getUnchecked(objectWithHash(0));
    CacheTesting.processPendingNotifications(cache);

   *
   * @since 3.0 (source-compatible since 2.0)
   */
  @SafeVarargs // For Eclipse. For internal javac we have disabled this pointless type of warning.
  public static <E> ImmutableSet<E> of(E e1, E e2, E e3, E e4, E e5, E e6, E... others) {
    checkArgument(
        others.length <= Integer.MAX_VALUE - 6, "the total number of elements must fit in an int");

  public static void awaitTerminationUninterruptibly(ExecutorService executor) {
    // TODO(cpovirk): We could optimize this to avoid calling nanoTime() at all.
    verify(awaitTerminationUninterruptibly(executor, Long.MAX_VALUE, NANOSECONDS));
  }

  /**
   * Invokes {@code executor.}{@link ExecutorService#awaitTermination(long, TimeUnit)
   * awaitTermination(long, TimeUnit)} uninterruptibly.
   *

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should handle different previous session IDs")
    void testDifferentPreviousSessionIds() throws Exception {
        // Given
        long[] sessionIds = { 0L, 1L, Long.MAX_VALUE, Long.MIN_VALUE, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFL };

        for (long sessionId : sessionIds) {
            Smb2SessionSetupRequest req = new Smb2SessionSetupRequest(mockContext, TEST_SECURITY_MODE, TEST_CAPABILITIES, sessionId, null);