new SecureRandom().nextBytes(newFileId);

            assertDoesNotThrow(() -> request.setFileId(newFileId));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle null file ID in setter")
        void testSetNullFileId() {
            assertDoesNotThrow(() -> request.setFileId(null));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle various file ID sizes")

					</la:link>
				</div>
			</c:if>
		</c:if>
	</aside>
</div>
<div class="row">
	<nav id="subfooter" class="mx-auto">
		<ul class="pagination justify-content-center">
			<c:if test="${existPrevPage}">
				<li class="page-item"><la:link styleClass="page-link" aria-label="Previous"

    Builder<String, Integer> builder =
        new Builder<String, Integer>()
            .put("one", 1)
            .put("one", 1); // throwing on this line would be even better

    IllegalArgumentException expected =
        assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> builder.build());
    assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("one");
  }

  public void testOf() {

   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new
   *     RuntimeException(e)}. But consider whether users would be better off if your API threw a
   *     different type of exception. For background on the deprecation, read <a
   *     href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/Why-we-deprecated-Throwables.propagate">Why we

 *       method to obtain a correctly-sized copy.
 *   <li>The performance of using the associated {@code Builder} class can be assumed to be no
 *       worse, and possibly better, than creating a mutable collection and copying it.
 *   <li>Implementations generally do not cache hash codes. If your element or key type has a slow
 *       {@code hashCode} implementation, it should cache it itself.
 * </ul>

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder with a hint for how many distinct keys are expected to be added. The
   * generated builder is equivalent to that returned by {@link #builder}, but may perform better if
   * {@code expectedKeys} is a good estimate.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedKeys} is negative
   * @since 33.3.0
   */

            new SecureRandom().nextBytes(newFileId);

            assertDoesNotThrow(() -> request.setFileId(newFileId));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle null file ID in setter")
        void testSetNullFileId() {
            assertDoesNotThrow(() -> request.setFileId(null));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle various file ID sizes")

            like to get an error. Currently we do, but if we add the extra <inherits> lines, we
            won't.

            I have one idea for a better approach, but it's painful, and I haven't tested it: We
            could postprocess Collect.gwt.xml to add <skip> lines for all the files that should be
            covered by testModule.gwt.xml. Maybe I'll try it someday.

  // implementations.

  private Futures() {}

  /**
   * Creates a {@code ListenableFuture} which has its value set immediately upon construction. The
   * getters just return the value. This {@code Future} can't be canceled or timed out and its
   * {@code isDone()} method always returns {@code true}.
   */
  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> ListenableFuture<V> immediateFuture(

   * structure (to make it possible to throw ConcurrentModificationException in the iterator). Note
   * that we choose not to make this volatile, so we do less of a "best effort" to track such
   * errors, for better performance.
   */
  private transient int metadata;

  /** The number of elements contained in the set. */
  private transient int size;

  /** Constructs a new empty instance of {@code CompactHashSet}. */