1. APIs marked with the `@Beta` annotation at the class or method level
are subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even
removed, at any time. If your code is a library itself (i.e. it is
used on the CLASSPATH of users outside your own control), you should
not use beta APIs, unless you [repackage] them. **If your
code is a library, we strongly recommend using the [Guava Beta Checker] to
ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

	accountValue := m["account"].(string)
	actionValue := m["action"].(string)

	// Allow user `minio` to perform any action.
	var res Result
	if accountValue == "minio" {
		res.Result = true
	} else {
		// All other users may not perform any `s3:Put*` operations.
		res.Result = true
		if strings.HasPrefix(actionValue, "s3:Put") {
			res.Result = false
		}
	}

После авторизации в системе вы увидите следующее:

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image05.png">

### Получение собственных пользовательских данных

Теперь, используя операцию `GET` с путем `/users/me`, вы получите данные пользователя, например:

```JSON
{
  "username": "johndoe",
  "email": "******@****.***",
  "full_name": "John Doe",
  "disabled": false,
  "hashed_password": "fakehashedsecret"

- Contains well-written, logical commits explaining *why* changes were made (e.g., “Add S3 bucket tagging support so that users can organize resources efficiently”).
- Is small, focused, and easy to review—ideally one commit, unless multiple commits better narrate complex work.
- Adheres to MinIO’s coding standards (e.g., Go style, error handling, testing).

   * already been re-added.
   */
  // Technically should accept RemovalNotification<? extends K, ? extends V>, but because
  // RemovalNotification is guaranteed covariant, let's make users' lives simpler.
  void onRemoval(RemovalNotification<K, V> notification);

On the other side, there are thousands of users in the chat systems, so there's a high chance you'll find someone to talk to there, almost all the time. 😄

## Sponsor the author { #sponsor-the-author }

     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map
     * feature for entrySet() that supports add(), or something else
     */

import org.apache.maven.api.toolchain.ToolchainModel;

/**
 * Represents a toolchain in the Maven build system.
 *
 * <p>A toolchain is a set of tools that can be used to build a project.
 * This interface allows users to define and configure various toolchains
 * that can be utilized by Maven during the build process. Toolchains can
 * include compilers, interpreters, and other tools that are necessary

   * Indicates whether this domain name represents a <i>public suffix</i>, as defined by the Mozilla
   * Foundation's <a href="http://publicsuffix.org/">Public Suffix List</a> (PSL). A public suffix
   * is one under which Internet users can directly register names, such as {@code com}, {@code
   * co.uk} or {@code pvt.k12.wy.us}. Examples of domain names that are <i>not</i> public suffixes

    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
      <!-- *not* <scope>test</scope>; <scope>compile</scope> is right so that guava-testlib users get junit transitively. -->
      <version>4.13.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <!--
      Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
      -->