*
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization
 * primitives. The strategies are all implemented as subtypes of AtomicHelper and the strategy is
 * selected in the static initializer of AbstractFuture. This is convenient and performant but
 * introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the fallback strategies.
 *

                            // Select an appropriate available version from the (now restricted) range
                            // Note this version was selected before to get the appropriate POM
                            // But it was reset by the call to setVersionRange on restricting the version
                            ResolutionNode[] resetNodes = {previous, node};

 * Don't need to worry about intermediate responses like redirects and retries.
 * Are always invoked once, even if the HTTP response is served from the cache.
 * Observe the application's original intent. Unconcerned with OkHttp-injected headers like `If-None-Match`.
 * Permitted to short-circuit and not call `Chain.proceed()`.
 * Permitted to retry and make multiple calls to `Chain.proceed()`.

    void testMirrorStopOnFirstMatch() {
        // exact matches win first
        Mirror mirrorA2 = newMirror("a2", "a,b", "http://a2");
        Mirror mirrorA = newMirror("a", "a", "http://a");
        // make sure repeated entries are skipped
        Mirror mirrorA3 = newMirror("a", "a", "http://a3");

        Mirror mirrorB = newMirror("b", "b", "http://b");
        Mirror mirrorC = newMirror("c", "d,e", "http://de");

   *       collections intelligently fall back to a binary search tree if hash table collisions are
   *       detected. Rather than going to all the trouble of reimplementing this ourselves, we
   *       simply switch over to use the JDK implementation wholesale if probable hash flooding is
   *       detected, sacrificing the compactness guarantee in very rare cases in exchange for much
   *       more reliable worst-case behavior.

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Edge Case Tests")
    class EdgeCaseTest {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle repeated method calls consistently")
        void shouldHandleRepeatedMethodCallsConsistently() {
            SmbSession mockSession = mock(SmbSession.class);
            Configuration mockConfig = mock(Configuration.class);

securityContext: runAsUser: {{ .Values.makeBucketJob.securityContext.runAsUser }} runAsGroup: {{ .Values.makeBucketJob.securityContext.runAsGroup }} fsGroup: {{ .Values.makeBucketJob.securityContext.fsGroup }} {{- end }} volumes: - name: minio-configuration projected: sources: - configMap: name: {{ template "minio.fullname" . }} - secret: name: {{ template "minio.secretName" . }} {{- if .Values.tls.enabled }} - name: cert-secret-volume-mc secret: secretName: {{ .Values.tls.certSecret }} items: - key: {{ .Values.tls.publicCrt...

 * more ACEs are evaluated until all desired access bits (combined)
 * are "allowed". If all of the desired access bits are not "allowed"
 * the then same process is repeated for inherited ACEs.
 * <p>
 * For example, if user <code>WNET\alice</code> tries to open a file
 * with desired access bits <code>0x00000003</code> (<code>FILE_READ_DATA |

        assertEquals(sessionFlags, resp.getSessionFlags(), "Session flags should decode");
        assertTrue(resp.isLoggedInAsGuest(), "Guest/anonymous should be detected");

        // prepare should propagate session id when received
        CIFSContext mockCtx = mock(CIFSContext.class);
        when(mockCtx.getConfig()).thenReturn(mock(Configuration.class));

            );
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Performance and Stability Tests")
    class PerformanceTests {

        @RepeatedTest(value = 10, name = "Repeated encoding/decoding stability test {currentRepetition}/{totalRepetitions}")
        @DisplayName("Encoding and decoding is stable across multiple iterations")
        void testEncodingDecodingStability() throws Exception {