url = uri("$artifactoryUrl/libs-${libsType.get()}-local")
            credentials {
                username = artifactoryUserName
                password = artifactoryUserPassword
            }
        }
    }

    publications.withType<MavenPublication>().configureEach {
        pom {
            description = provider {

If a client tries to send some extra data, they will receive an **error** response.

For example, if the client tries to send the form fields:

* `username`: `Rick`
* `password`: `Portal Gun`
* `extra`: `Mr. Poopybutthole`

They will receive an error response telling them that the field `extra` is not allowed:

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {

* Make sure you have well defined Pydantic models for your request bodies and responses.
* Configure any required permissions and roles using dependencies.
* Never store plaintext passwords, only password hashes.
* Implement and use well-known cryptographic tools, like pwdlib and JWT tokens, etc.
* Add more granular permission controls with OAuth2 scopes where needed.
* ...etc.

                        password = new String(auth.getPassword());
                    } catch (final Exception ex) {
                        log.debug("Interactive authentication failed", ex);
                    }
                }
                final Type2Message type2 = (Type2Message) message;
                message = new Type3Message(this.transportContext, type2, null, password, domain, user,

		// More than maxConfigSize bytes were available
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrAdminConfigTooLarge), r.URL)
		return
	}

	password := cred.SecretKey
	configBytes, err := madmin.DecryptData(password, io.LimitReader(r.Body, r.ContentLength))
	if err != nil {
		adminLogIf(ctx, err)
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrAdminConfigBadJSON), r.URL)
		return
	}

## About third party integrations { #about-third-party-integrations }

In this example we are using the OAuth2 "password" flow.

This is appropriate when we are logging in to our own application, probably with our own frontend.

Because we can trust it to receive the `username` and `password`, as we control it.

					<div class="input-group mb-3">
						<c:set var="ph_new_password">
							<la:message key="labels.login.placeholder_new_password" />
						</c:set>
						<la:password property="password" class="form-control"
							placeholder="${ph_new_password}" />
						<div class="input-group-append">
							<span class="input-group-text">
								<i class="fa fa-lock fa-fw" aria-hidden="true"></i>
							</span>

						</div>
					</div>
					<div class="input-group mb-3">
						<c:set var="ph_password">
							<la:message key="labels.login.placeholder_password" />
						</c:set>
						<la:password property="password" class="form-control"
							placeholder="${ph_password}" />
						<div class="input-group-append">
							<span class="input-group-text">
								<i class="fa fa-lock fa-fw" aria-hidden="true"></i>
							</span>

)

// Provider implements identity provider specific admin operations, such as
// looking up users, fetching additional attributes etc.
type Provider interface {
	LoginWithUser(username, password string) error
	LoginWithClientID(clientID, clientSecret string) error
	LookupUser(userid string) (User, error)

        assertFalse(useRawNTLM, "Should delegate raw NTLM setting");
        assertTrue(disablePlainTextPasswords, "Should delegate plain text password setting");
        assertEquals("GUEST", guestUsername, "Should delegate guest username");
        assertEquals("", guestPassword, "Should delegate guest password");
        assertFalse(allowGuestFallback, "Should delegate guest fallback setting");

        verify(mockDelegate).getLanManCompatibility();